Hello readers. I recently decided to join ItsAllOverFatMan.com, so I will immediately cease posting any new content on this site. Please read my work at my new home, and tell a friend that we’ll be glad to have them join us there as well.
What A John Fox Defense Looks Like
January 13, 2011
I’m pretty excited about the hiring of John Fox. He wasn’t my first choice, but when Gregg Williams declined to be interviewed, I started to warm to Fox over Perry Fewell. I’ve said this a few times, but I’ll do it again. While I ordinarily favor offensive coaches, this Broncos football team was screaming for a guy who leans to defense. After all of the ridiculous turnover on that side of the ball, coupled with a non-systemic approach to player acquisition under the Shanahan regime running into a short-lived McDaniels regime, there are a lot of mismatched parts that don’t play with much cohesion. I think that getting one system in place, and playing it for a long time, and acquiring players specifically to fit it will be hugely beneficial.
Here’s the thing, though. John Fox isn’t a system guy, really. He’s a football guy, who manages the whole team, and leaves the systems and the play-calling to his coordinators. His overall framework, though, is one that emphasizes toughness, preparation, execution, and intelligence. The Broncos got a decent start on becoming tougher and more physical under the McDaniels regime, but there’s still a ways to go, and Fox will always push for getting more physical, on both sides of the ball.
As I think about the defenses employed by Fox in Charlotte, he had three different coordinators, who all did similar things. Jack Del Rio had the job for one year in 2002, and then Mike Trgovac held the job from 2003-2008. He was offered a new contract, but declined to accept it, and Ron Meeks took over in 2009. All three coaches ran one-gap 40-front schemes which aimed to rush with 4 men, and drop seven men back into (mostly zone) coverage.
Some people will yawn at that, and it’s not very exotic, but it’s the soundest way to play defensive football. If your 4 men can beat 5 blockers, that means you have 7 coverage players guarding 5 eligible receivers. The trick to doing that is to have the right 4 guys to beat the five linemen. If you have those guys, you’re in business.
I mentioned that there was a lot of continuity across three coordinators. Del Rio and Trgovac both ran a lot of Cover-2 and Cover-3. Under Meeks, it was a lot more Cover-2 heavy. Throughout Fox’s 9 years in Charlotte, though, there was consistently a 40-front orientation, that favored size and power in the front seven, and sound coverage in the back-end. This is what we should expect from the Broncos in 2011 and beyond, and the good news is that a lot of the necessary personnel is in place right now.
First, let’s go over what Cover-2 and a Cover-3 look like, for those who aren’t familiar with the terms.
This is your basic Cover-2 look, and every team in the NFL runs it sometimes. Very simply, the front 4 rushes, and the back seven drops into coverage, with 2 deep (the “2″ in Cover-2), and 5 across at the intermediate level. The CBs are asked to jam the WRs at the line, and re-route them to the inside of the field. Then, they stay shallow outside, and read the flat. It’s their responsibility to rally to the ball and make sure tackles if a play goes there. If nothing is coming that way, they drop back deeper, to narrow the window on the deep outside, which is the most vulnerable area of Cover-2. Since it’s the hardest throw for a QB to consistently hit, you live with that vulnerability. In the deep area, the Safeties each have half the field. (In the Tampa-2 variant, the MLB drops deeper, and it becomes a situation of deep-thirds, instead of halves.) The key here, is that all 7 coverage men are watching the QB, as well as the receivers in their zones. That allows a multitude of players to run to the ball, and make tackles, once completions are made.
This is Cover-3, which, again, every team runs. It tends to be sounder deep, and less sound short, than Cover-2. The reason for that is that the 3 best cover men on the field are in deep-thirds, and the 4 lesser ones are in short quarters. If you’ve got a back like Darren Sproles, it’s a good idea to hit a Cover-3 in the flats, because the LBs generally don’t have the range to get out there. You run Cover-3 for 2 reasons; one is that you think that your opponent is going to try to hit you deep. You may be more likely to run quarters there, though, which as it sounds, means the 2 CBs and 2 Safeties are each playing a deep quarter. If it’s like 3rd and 19, you’re likely to see quarters. The other reason to run Cover-3 is that it starts with the SS running up into the box, so it works nicely when you think the play might be a run. Whereas Cover-2 is vulnerable against the run, Cover-3 does a better job against it.
So, like I said, none of this is exotic or uncommon. Everybody has played Cover-2 and Cover-3, going back to college, and maybe even high school. It’s not so much a scheme as it is a staple of every scheme. It won’t ever inspire a reporter to write their magnum opus, even though, ironically, they may actually understand what’s really happening on the field, for a change. It’s boring, but effective. There are benefits to this, of course. Since everybody has done it, it’s easy to find players who can do it. Competently dropping into a short zone is a basic job requirement for all LBs at all levels of football. If you can’t do it, you’re not in the NFL. Also, since you’re running the same stuff a lot of times, the focus becomes on perfecting your execution through repetition. Rather than spending a lot of time on new plays every week, defenses can focus on getting it right consistently.
This is not to say that some creativity doesn’t occur with zone-heavy schemes. It does, and it can be more devastating when you pull it out, since teams don’t expect it. Usually, you’ll get a zone-blitz in those situations, and a QB suddenly throws a ball to a DE, because he’s surprised to see him in an underneath zone.
As for personnel, I’ve touched on this in the past, but I’ll reiterate it. The Broncos current defensive players are probably best for a 40-front scheme. I believe that both Elvis Dumervil and Robert Ayers are natural 4-3 ends, and that they complement each other well. Ayers is the Left End, battling with either TEs or RTs, setting the edge on the strongside. Dumervil is the Right End, rushing the passer on what is usually the open side. Justin Bannan is scheme-indifferent, and can play anywhere from 5-technique to 5-technique. In the diagrams above, I’m picturing him as the 1-technique. For depth, you have quality players like Marcus Thomas (assuming he’s re-signed), Kevin Vickerson, and Jason Hunter. With the second pick in the Draft, I’m hoping for Nick Fairley to be the primary 3-technique DT, but if he’s gone, there are other fine DL options.
At LB, there’s a passable bunch in place. I like Joe Mays as the Mike for this kind of scheme, and I think D.J. Williams and Wesley Woodyard can both handle the Will. If you asked me the one player in the NFL I’d compare Mario Haggan to, I’d tell you it’s Na’il Diggs, who was a good Sam LB for John Fox for 4 years in Carolina. Obviously, I’d like to draft some competition at these spots, but there are competent options in place.
The secondary is where it gets interesting. I don’t think that Brian Dawkins or Renaldo Hill are particularly great fits for this style of this defense, but Darcel McBath might be, if he can ever stay healthy. Likewise, I think David Bruton can do this stuff as a backup and special teams ace. At CB, Champ Bailey can play zone or man equally well, and he needs to be re-signed. Andre’ Goodman, however, is much better in man-to-man, and may not be a fit here. I’d say that I suspect the same is true for Perrish Cox, but I haven’t seen him play much zone, so the jury is out. The good news is that I’ve always thought that Syd’Quan Thompson can be a quality starter in a zone-heavy defense.
I’m not a guy to do 73 mock drafts between now and April, but let’s just say the Broncos get Fairley second overall, which can be done with little-to-no effort or conjecture. From there, you have a pretty set defensive line, and you’re free to start taking LBs, Safeties, and CBs, as well as maybe a RB or TE. These defensive players will have all done what they’re now being asked to do repeatedly, and the defense can turn around very quickly. This is how you can go from 1-15 to 7-9 in one year, and to the Super Bowl the next. What John Fox wants to do is win with toughness and consistency, and not necessarily with cleverness. Having been a fan of a very technocratic team the last 15 years, I welcome this new approach, and I expect it to be successful quickly.
On Gunslinging And Rookie Quarterbacks
January 4, 2011
Monday Night Thoughts 21 Comments
I’d like to tell you a story, because, let’s face it, I always set up my football articles with personal stories which may or may not be relevant to my chosen football topic. You know what, though? It’s my platform, and I get to say what I want. This story takes place last Wednesday, December 29th, in lovely Cleveland, Ohio. I like the Christmas season, without actually liking the holiday itself. The reason I like it is that a lot of my closest friends who’ve skipped town for jobs, or spouses, or whatever, come home for the holidays.
Last Wednesday, I organized a get-together at a bar called Becky’s, which is right behind my alma mater, Cleveland State University. It was my fraternity’s key hangout when I was an undergraduate, and it’s pretty central to the Cleveland metro area, which runs east and west along Lake Erie. I invited about 30 people on Facebook, and about 20 showed up, which is a good turnout. It was lots of fun. It came to pass, at around 11:30 PM, that a long-time female friend of mine, Ashley, asked me to help her with something. She had taken her boyfriend’s truck, and she had had a couple drinks, and it occurred to her as she was getting ready to leave that there was a loaded gun in the glovebox.
She’s not such a gun person, and really, neither am I, but I was in the military, so I’ve used them before. She was (smartly) worried that if she got pulled over after drinking any alcohol at all, and the gun was found, she’d be charged with a felony. I was asked to unload the gun, and agreed to do so. She, and I, and another guy went out to the parking lot, and she showed me the gun in the glovebox, a holstered .38 revolver. I am more of a 9 millimeter guy, but whatever, I figured out how the cylinder released, and I dumped the bullets into my left hand.
As this was happening, a random vagrant-looking fellow came up behind us, and hollered something on the order of “Yo, yo, yo!” My friend Kevin told the guy that we were in the middle of something, and he told us that that had nothing to do with him. I told him that it did, in fact, and that we needed him to move along. He saw the gun in my right hand, and said “Oh, you’re going to pull a gun on me, huh?” Then he pulled his own 9 millimeter, and showed it to us. He was about 5 feet away from me, and I instantly went on alert when I saw it.
I can honestly say that I wasn’t scared, but I’ll get back to that. I looked at the guy, and I focused on his right hand, and I calmly explained to him what I had been doing, and why, and that we weren’t a threat to him. I asked him again to move on, wished him a good night. He paused for a second, and then put the gun away, and did so, and was grumbling that all he wanted was 3 dollars so he could get something to eat. In hindsight, I wish I’d given it to him, because I respect him for being calm, and for not raising up with the gun. If he had, I was 100% ready to charge him, and then, who knows what the outcome would have been?
First of all, on not being scared, that was the third time I’d had a gun pulled on me, and it ended up being the third time I’d talked my way out of trouble. I was a very scared teenager the first two times, but I got through it. Afterward, my heart had gone a mile a minute. In this moment, both Kevin and Ashley were calm, or at least silent, in the moment, and were upset afterward. This time, I was perfectly calm, both before and afterward, and I’m still surprised by that. I can only conclude that it’s because it wasn’t my first rodeo. I’m glad to be alive, and in good health, but if the guy had raised up, I was more than ready to fight, and let it be what it would be. You deal with the situations life gives you, the best you can.
So, now onto Quarterbacks. Think about a rookie Quarterback, who’s never been on an NFL field, against NFL competition, and NFL schemes. How many of these guys have you seen just look overwhelmed, especially in their first few games? Remember Jay Cutler’s awful first start against Seattle? Joe Flacco struggled in his debut in 2008. Matt Stafford looked lost in his first start in 2009. Mark Sanchez started pretty strong, but finished his rookie year with 26 interceptions. This year, how about Jimmy Clausen? Or maybe Colt McCoy? Even Sam Bradford had a fairly rough first start.
Very few players start out looking comfortable or efficient, because it’s pretty hard to be either thing. Josh Freeman and Matt Ryan had about the best recent starting debuts, and Freeman completed less than 50% of his throws, while Ryan only had 13 attempts, amid a run-heavy attack. Tim Tebow has never looked rattled, for even one moment. From the perspective of the eye test, that’s the most impressive thing to me. It’s frankly shocking, when you think about it. Has he even had to burn a timeout because he was confused, or taken a delay-of-game penalty, yet? I don’t remember anything like that, personally. It’s almost like he’s had a gun pulled on him once or twice in the past, and he knows how to act in those situations. Maybe big-game experience in college translates better than people think it does.
Let’s actually expand our thinking, and get statistical, and consider the first three starts of these guys against Tim Tebow’s. We’ll compare apples-to-apples below:

The leaders in each category are in green. A few things jump out quickly, don’t they? First of all, Tebow sweeps the rushing stats, which is no surprise. Some people are going to say that that is somehow negative, but they’re full of crap. We’ll get back to that. Just generally, it’s clear that Tebow compares just fine as a passer when stacked up against these other players, who are either good, most probably going to be good, or 2010 highly-drafted rookies. There’s no JaMarcus Russell, Matt Leinart, Vince Young, or Brady Quinn to bring the averages down here.
Getting specific, you can also notice that Tebow has the lowest completion percentage, but the highest yard-per-attempt. Doesn’t it seem like that shouldn’t compute? He had 41 throws that definitionally got nothing, but he still led the way in yards-per-attempt. Well, for one thing, he’s the only guy on this list who had a 300 yard passing day in his first three starts. For another, check out this supplemental chart, featuring yards per completion:
That’s the real story there. Completion percentage is a fairly worthless statistic, because it measures completions against attempts, and all completions and attempts are clearly not created equally. It’d be a little hard to track discretely, but a better measure would be a weighted average, with weighting based upon distance the ball the travels in the air. Yards per attempt is the best mainstream statistic available, but it can even be inflated by a lot of yards-after-catch.
In any case, when you’re averaging more than 16 yards per completion, you’re going down the field with the football, and you’re going to throw some incompletions, rookie or not. I know what you’re thinking. How does 16.28 yards/completion stack up against the rest of the NFL? Check out the top 10 for the 2010 season:
Tebow’s 16.28 yards per completion would lead the NFL, by far, over a full season. His 8.04 yards per attempt would be fifth, behind Philip Rivers, Aaron Rodgers, Ben Roethlisberger, and Michael Vick, and just ahead of Tom Brady. The difference between first and fifth is his 49.4% completion percentage.
I’ve seen a lot of hand-wringing among un-knowledgeable media people about Tebow’s “inaccuracy”, so let me reiterate this. It’s a small sample, but 49.4% completion percentage is the difference between first in the NFL, and fifth, in terms of productivity on a per-attempt basis. You’d like to to be first, but fifth is pretty good, right? It may be a small sample, but I have a lot of reason to believe that with absolutely no improvement, Tebow could continue to put up the numbers that he’s put up over the last 3 games. He’s always thrown a great deep ball, and that’s what has been putting up these numbers.
It’s not at all realistic, though, to expect that Tebow won’t improve. He’s already improved his mechanics and pocket presence, a lot, and he’s well-known for being the hardest-working Bronco. He’s going to keep hitting the screens, and improving on it, and he’s going to learn how to hit checkdowns. Once, he does, his completion percentage will be in the low 60s, and he’ll still be super-dangerous down the field. Safeties can’t sell out for the deep pass, because they have to watch him in the running game, and it’s only going to get worse when he improves his short passing.
On to the topic of Tebow’s running, I wish a lot of people would shut the hell up about it. More than any player I’ve ever seen, people love to deduct points from Tebow because he has extra skills which aren’t usually seen at his position. I’ve said that before, and it’s as true as ever, as completely asinine as it is. Now, the narrative is that you can’t play like he plays over a long period of time. How do you know? There’s never been a player like him before, so nobody knows. I think his college performance indicates that he probably can run the ball 8-10 times a game, and stay healthy enough in doing so. He was running it an average of 12 times per game in college. I know, I know, it’s college, but the SEC annually has (clearly) the biggest, fastest, and best defensive players in the country, and he was running a lot of straight up dive plays, which should only be run in goal-line situations in the NFL. He missed only one start in college, and it was due to a concussion suffered on a blind-side sack, when his right tackle completely whiffed on a block, and Kentucky’s DE got a clean, full-speed shot on Tebow. He tended to lead with his right shoulder, intelligently, and while it was banged up in his junior year, he played through it.
Something like 2 goal-line runs, 3-4 QB draws, and 4-5 scrambles per game is sustainable for a guy who is as big, tough, and strong as Tebow is. He’ll learn to slide and go out of bounds some, but when you need him to run somebody over, he will. Remember, this is the strongest human being ever to play the position, stronger, even, than 80% of the defensive linemen in the NFL. Running the ball is always going to be a weapon for Tebow, and it’s one that should be embraced, not discouraged.
The running threat combines with the threat of the deep ball, and defenses are severely threatened. They’ve been more threatened the last three weeks than they were with Kyle Orton under center, haven’t they been? Orton was hitting throws, but good defenses were able to adjust to that, and limit it. He struggled mightily against the blitz, so everybody started blitzing him. Tebow is a huge threat to escape the blitz, and exploit a lot of open field, and that has to give you pause. Wait until the pass patterns are designed to take advantage of Tebow’s mobility next season, like they were when John Elway was around.
John Bena of Mile High Report wrote a story today which posited that willingness to work with Tebow shouldn’t be a prerequisite for hiring a new coach. I respect John, but I couldn’t disagree more. Tebow is a transcendent talent, a great team leader, and a winner. As I write this, I’m watching Andrew Luck in the Orange Bowl, and I like Luck, but I’d rather have Tebow. Luck is going to be a more mobile Matt Ryan, showing very comparable (excellent) accuracy and poise, and (strictly average) arm strength. (Luck’s opponent Tyrod Taylor from Virginia Tech actually a significantly stronger arm than Luck does.) Luck is a franchise quarterback, but Tebow is a franchise player, which is different.
Being a franchise player goes beyond what you can do on the field. It’s how you lead, it’s how you present yourself to the public, and it’s how you become the embodiment of your team, without even necessarily trying to be that. It’s the guy that you just KNOW is going to dominate, and make it really hard to beat his team. There have only been three of them lately in the whole NFL, and Tebow is the fourth. Tom Brady, Peyton Manning, Ray Lewis, and Tim Tebow. This is the guy who finally has the IT needed to fully succeed John Elway, and BE the Denver Broncos.
Everybody knows that I’ve been on the Tebow bandwagon since I first saw him play at Florida, and you know that if I’m wrong, I’ll cop to being wrong. I’m not, though. Given some decent help from the front office and coaching staff, Tim Tebow is going to win Super Bowls, plural, and he’s going to do it in a Denver Broncos uniform. It’s just like Champ Bailey said; I’ve never seen a winner not win.
On a final note, let’s do our part to retire the word gunslinger, vis-a-vis characterizing quarterbacks, okay? It’s a stupid term, and it basically minimizes gun violence, which is very serious. It’s a lot like calling a scandal whatevergate, or a Draft room a War Room. Gun violence, Watergate, and wars are very serious things, and they shouldn’t be equated with much less serious things, because it damages people’s perspective and understanding. Thanks.
/dismount from soap box
A Teachable Moment: The Screen Game
December 26, 2010
Have you ever noticed how bad the Broncos are at defending the screen game? Seemingly, for years, it’s been a consistent weakness. The main reason is that they have mostly had to rush more than four men to get any pressure on the opposing Quarterback. A secondary cause is that the Broncos have rarely fielded good tackling teams over the last 25 years or so. Even in today’s victory against the Texans, numerous screens were successfully run against the Broncos. It’s frustrating, isn’t it?
The other side of that coin is how you can frustrate the other team by maximizing the effectiveness of your own screen game. This has never really been an area of strength for the Broncos, either, over the last 25 years. The reason why is the Quarterback, going back to John Elway, and continuing through the recently-ended Kyle Orton era. The Broncos just haven’t ever had guys who were very comfortable or consistent with setting up the screen game, so a potentially devastating weapon has often not been used much.
There are certain “learned observers” (guffaw) of Broncos football, such as Vic Lombardi and Dullard Krieger who just hate them some screens, especially ones to WRs. They never go anywhere, and they’re just, like, SOOOOOO predictable! Here comes another WR screen for no gain! Jeremy Bates/Josh McDaniels/Mike McCoy is a bad play-caller!!!! Every time they don’t work, it’s the same line of commentary. I think many Broncos fans have the same attitude toward the screen game, because, as already mentioned, it’s never been executed well by the Broncos.
That’s pretty clearly about to change, because Tim Tebow has a very good skill-set with the screen game, and that’s the most important thing to being effective with it. He did some screening at Florida, and he’s obviously worked hard at it since coming to the Broncos.
Let me reiterate a counterintuitive truth. The QB is the most important player in properly executing the screen game. (Most people consider screen yards to be cheap passing yards for the QB’s stats, but they really aren’t.) There are certain QBs who are very good at setting up screens, such as Tom Brady, Drew Brees, Phillip Rivers, Aaron Rodgers, and Brett Favre. There are also good QBs who seem to struggle with it, and therefore, do it less often, like Michael Vick, Joe Flacco, Ben Roethlisberger, and Matt Ryan.
Several things must happen for an effective screen:
1. The QB must be a good ball-handler. That means he must receive the snap cleanly and quickly, either from under center or the shotgun. This is crucial to proper timing.
2. The QB must keep his eyes downfield, and his footwork/drop consistent with a deep throw. This causes the safeties to drop backward, rather than to rally forward to the catch point.
3. The QB must be willing to take a frontal hit. For most screens, he has to invite the rush, and let it get close to him. Best case, he takes a little shove, and keeps backpedaling safely. Worst case, he takes a shot in the face, and ends up on his back. In either case, he has to be tough and calm enough to wait until the last minute to throw the ball.
4. The QB must play with good pace, and have a strong sense of timing. This is the most important thing. Pace means the speed at which the player’s body is moving; you want to play at a comfortable and consistent pace, which is mechanically effective. The correct pace varies from player to player, but each player has one. It’s most easily illustrated through a basketball comparison. If you think of Monta Ellis from the Golden State Warriors, his pace is very quick, but he stays under control as he gets to the rim, and his level of momentum aids his accuracy around the hoop. (An incredible 63% for a Guard.) Steve Nash mostly plays at a medium pace, but he often stops very quickly. He gets separation for his pull-up jumper through that quick deceleration, and that quick movement gives the jumper consistent pace and feel, which leads to exceptional accuracy. Andre Miller plays slow, and posts up a lot, and he uses that slow pace to draw a lot of and-one fouls. The contact he gets gives his shots rhythm.
To run a good screen, the QB can never get in a hurry, especially in his lower half. That has always been Kyle Orton’s issue, that his feet get screwed up because he panics at the quick rush. You’re asking for that rush, and counting on it, so you need to move quickly, and narrowly avoid it, but stay under control. Tom Brady is slow-footed, and he often drifts away from the rush to help him keep separation. A quicker-footed guy like Rodgers may not need to do so. By playing with pace, and always having your feet ready to throw on time, you set the receivers up for a lot of success by earning them separation from the rush.
5. The QB must make an accurate throw. This is harder than you’d think, making an accurate throw in a short area, which gives the receiver the ball heading in an upfield direction. It’s a lot like shooting a fade-away jump shot over a 7 footer. It requires pace, as mentioned before, and athleticism, as well as solid throwing touch.
Tim Tebow showed a lot of all of these qualities today. That has me very excited for the future, because the way he looked, and with the mobile linemen the Broncos have, I can definitely envision them quickly running a lot of different screens, and gaining 100 yards per game on them, like the best screen teams do. The Learned Few don’t get this, because they’ve only really ever watched the Broncos with their lack of historical success with the screen game, but 100 yards of screens per game goes a long way toward being an outstanding offense.
It’s relatively easy, low-risk yardage, and it has the benefit of slowing down the pass rush, and/or causing secondary players to jump screen routes to their detriment. You want to have a lot of different kinds of screens from different personnel groupings, so that it doesn’t become stale or predictable. The Chargers and Saints are exemplary in this way, and their screens really help to open up their downfield passing. You can really mess with a defense by being able to screen and go deep from all of the same formations and groupings, because the threat of each of the two things helps the other be more effective.
Vic Lombardi tweeted to me today that the seven or so completed screens by the Broncos may be a team record. He didn’t seem to mean that positively, but he’ll get on board with that record being broken frequently when he sees how well it works. A well-executed screen game combined with an effective downfield effort is unstoppable. For Vic, and for everybody else, this is today’s Teachable Moment. Peep this diagram.
This play is commonly called a Bubble Screen. It’s not actually a screen, in the most technical sense, because there’s no delay to it, and it doesn’t scheme offensive linemen out in front of the ball-carrier, but it has the same effects as a true screen. The look here is Trips Left against a 3-3 nickel, most likely a zone. (We know that because the Left CB is aligned on the TE, away from the strength of the formation.) This is a good defense to run the screen against, because there are 3 blockers (SE, SB, LT) to hit 3 defensive players (CB, NB, WLB). Actually, if it works correctly, we’d like the Split End (let’s call him Brandon Lloyd) to push the charging CB outside, and then go hit the FS. It’s on the Flanker (maybe Demariyus Thomas or Eddie Royal) to ultimately make the CB miss, once he catches the ball.
This is the sort of thing that works really well, until eventually, the FS and the CB read it pre-snap and jump it. When Jabar Gaffney got clocked on Tebow’s bad throw today, that’s what was goingon . That’s the time when Vic and others start bitching on Twitter about how the offense is too predictable and conservative. Then, you do this.
The CB and FS step up to prevent the quick throw, and Tebow fakes in that direction. Lloyd half-heartedly hits the CB this time, and then takes off downfield, past the out-of-position FS in Cover-2. It’s pitch and catch, and it was set up by the “predictable, conservative” bubble screen. Next time, the defense doesn’t know what to do against this look, so both options are likely to be effective. This is a small part of what non-Learned people like me call good offensive design. You make multiple options look the same, and it’s a killer.
Finally, here’s something that Tebow is tremendously effective with that isn’t done too much in the NFL these days, but could be. It’s also not a screen, but is also similar in purpose.
Does anybody remember the shovel pass? You need the right kind of TE to run this, like Tebow had at Florida in Aaron Hernandez, but this can be an absolutely deadly play. Think of it as a different take on a cross between a triple option and an old-school trap. Tebow receives the snap, and can hand it to the RB if the 5T DE crashes hard inside. Ryan Clady is going to shove the 3T DE inside, and then head outside to hit the Will LB. The 3T is the play-side read. If he goes and tries to tackle the RB, (the trap read), Tebow should shovel the ball to the TE coming around the edge. If the 3T reads the shovel pass, and follows the TE, Tebow should run the ball into the left B-gap. It’s really hard to defend all three options, and Florida used to run this action 4-5 times per game, and get 3-4 first downs with it. With a quick TE, this should enter the Broncos playbook.
When you see somebody question the use of screen plays out of hand, you should be skeptical of their understanding of football. Teams which can properly execute their screen game, and are creative with the design of it can use it to great effect. Tim Tebow showed a good feel for running these plays today, and it should only improve with more reps over time. There are suddenly a lot of reasons to be optimistic for the future, and this is one that I don’t want to be missed.
WWTBD? (Part 2)
December 19, 2010
So yesterday, I played outside football consultant, and I remade the Broncos football organization. Today, I change gears, and become something intangible called consensus. It’s March 1, 2011, and we’re on the precipice of a talent acquisition cycle that could make this Broncos team improve very quickly. We have a new defensive scheme to work on staffing, and since it’s the Head Coach Gregg Williams’ scheme, we have some confidence that it’s there to stay for awhile, unlike the recent past. The offense will be slightly different too, under Pete Carmichael, Jr., but most of the key players are in place right now for it to be successful.
This exercise assumes that the Collective Bargaining Agreement gets figured out timely, which may or may not happen. In any case, there will eventually be a free agency period, and a Draft, and we’re going to work through all of that stuff now. Here goes.
Resigning Broncos Players
Champ Bailey – CB - He seems to be on the fence about staying or going, but I believe that with the hiring of Gregg Williams, he’ll be excited about staying. The pressure that Williams manufactures makes CBs look better than they actually are, and Bailey is getting older, so slippage is eventually going to start happening. A 4 year, $50 million contract probably gets it done with Champ.
Ryan Harris – RT – This is the key guy to decide on. He was excellent in 2008 and 2009 (before he got hurt), and after starting slow in 2010, he’s improved to about 75% of his 2008 self lately. Is this a guy who just needs to get further away from his injuries? I say that it’s probable that that’s the case, and the Broncos should use the franchise tag on him in 2011. That pays him a lot of money for one season, and minimizes the Broncos risk if he turns out not to approach his former excellence.
Marcus Thomas – DT/DE – Thomas has had a quietly excellent season as a rotation lineman. With the return to a one-gap 40-front scheme, this is the kind of player you want to bring back. He’s a 4 year, $15 million type of player, which he should appreciate, since he’s been a league-minimum player thus far in his career.
Matt Prater – K – Prater is one of the best kickers in the NFL, and he should be signed long-term. He’ll be a restricted free agent, assuming the rules are roughly the same as they are now.
Wesley Woodyard – LB – Woodyard is a good backup LB, and a key leader on special teams. You keep this guy as long as his price doesn’t get ridiculous. Signing him for 3 years and $7 million makes sense.
Ronald Fields – NT – Fields has worked hard for the Broncos, and been a decent player. I think that with the scheme change, letting him go elsewhere is wise.
Laurence Maroney – RB – I think he goes elsewhere, and the Broncos can hopefully get a supplementary pick for him in 2012. The trade for him was a bust, and there’s no sugar-coating that.
Other Teams’ Free Agents
With the defensive scheme change, there are a few positions that need talent infusions, between Free Agency and the Draft. The Broncos will need a couple good DTs, a pass rush specialist, and 1 to 2 safeties. Offensively, they’re in pretty good shape, but they could use some better offensive line depth, and a speed RB. We’re going to make one big-ticket signing in free agency to help the process, and a couple of smaller ones too.
Eric Weddle – FS – San Diego – The Chargers probably aren’t going to break the bank for Weddle, but he’s really improved, and turned into an excellent center-field Free Safety this season. The 46 scheme that Williams uses requires a smart FS who can range from sideline to sideline, and Weddle is that guy. He’ll cost, but this Draft is fairly weak in safeties. Figure he goes for something on the order of 4 years, $25 million. With Weddle in the deep middle, the Broncos can try to get another season out of Brian Dawkins, and use him as the box safety.
Clint Session – OLB – Indianapolis Colts – I like Session, who’s quick and active, and who plays stout at the point of attack. He’s a Will, but he’s the kind of Will that sticks his nose into the running game. Session has been hurt a lot this year, and Tyjuan Hagler has done a pretty good job in his place. The Colts don’t historically pay LBs, so I think 4 years and $12 million gets Session.
Remi Ayodele - DT – New Orleans Saints – Ayodele has been a key rotation player for the Saints, and Gregg Williams has gotten a lot out of him. Ayodele is active and quick, and he gets good penetration when he’s on the field. He’s worth 3 years, $10 million.
Abram Elam – SS – Cleveland Browns – This is primarily a hedge against Dawkins breaking down, but Elam can help on special teams, and in big nickel looks. He’s not a star player, but he’s a good player, and he’s the kind of guy that strong defenses have as key backups. He could be had for something like 3 years, $7 million.
Clint Ingram - LB – New Orleans Saints – Ingram is a solid backup LB, who played for Gregg Williams in Jacksonville, and was on the roster in New Orleans, while recovering from an injury. (He started 2010 on PUP, and was released on October 20th.) Ingram would be a guy you could sign for around the minimum, but who would help with the installation of a new defense.
That group is an awful lot like Josh McDaniels’ first free agent group, in that it brings in some solid guys to fill specific roles in a new scheme. Weddle, Ayodele, and Session are instant starters, and Elam is a key reserve who can play a lot.
2011 NFL Draft
We have to make a few assumptions here. We’ll assume that the Broncos have the 3rd pick in the Draft, as they currently do. I used Walter Football’s current mock draft order, because their guess is as good as mine on how the final records will be, and it saved me some work. I’m not generally too big on mock drafting this far ahead of time, but to get an accurate sense of who might be on the board for the Broncos 4 picks in the first 3 rounds, I did one.
1st Round, Pick 3 – Nick Fairley – DT – Auburn – This is the key guy that the Broncos can draft to make the Gregg Williams 46 scheme. One of the problems with staffing 30 fronts is that very, very few college teams run those schemes. Because of that, when you’re looking for defensive linemen and pass-rushing OLBs, you’re projecting guys to do different things than what you have film on. You pick a 4-3 DE like Robert Ayers thinking he can play Sam LB in a 3-4, and hopefully he can.
Fairley doesn’t need any projection. He’s a dominant one-gap DT, and he’s at least as much of a reason for Auburn’s presence in the National Championship game as Cameron Newton is. The rest of Auburn’s defense is bad, but every time the team has needed a big defensive play, Fairley has delivered. Fairley is extraordinarily quick off the ball, and he’s been dominant against both the run and the pass. At 6-5, and 300 pounds, he’s not a bad-bodied fat guy. I don’t think Fairley is quite as good a prospect as Ndamukong Suh, (he’s not as powerful), but I consider him to be a better one than Gerald McCoy. If Fairley went #1 or #2, which is possible, especially if Andrew Luck stays in school, the fallback plan would probably be Marcel Dareus from Alabama. Interestingly, he has been playing in a 30 front, but several draft pundits think he’s more of a natural one-gap 40-front guy.
2nd Round, Pick 36 – Jeremy Beal, DE/OLB, Oklahoma – If they’re going to be playing a pressure scheme, the Broncos can’t be caught short of pass rushers again, if Elvis Dumervil gets hurt. Beal could be a pass rush specialist as a rookie, playing on 3rd downs and pushing Robert Ayers inside on those downs. Williams’ scheme is about hitting the QB, and if an opposing offensive line has to block Beal, Ayers, Fairley, and Dumervil, and a free runner like Brian Dawkins on every 3rd down, I don’t like their chances of holding up for a whole game.
2nd Round, Pick 49 – DeMarco Murray, RB, Oklahoma – As I was thinking over needs, I considered RB and the OL here. Both could have better quality depth. I went RB, because backup Offensive Linemen are a contingency plan, meaning that you’d never play any besides your starting 5 unless you had to. Like QBs, there’s generally no rotation there, and the backups don’t do anything but some special teams. Multiple RBs, on the other hand, are used throughout football games. Knowshon Moreno has emerged as an excellent RB late in this season, and Murray would make a nice complement to him. He’s faster than Moreno, and he has an advanced feel for the passing game. He’s not Reggie Bush, but he can do some of the same stuff as Bush does for New Orleans, in terms of running a full route tree. The Saints like to motion Bush out wide of the outside WR, often Marques Colston. That causes a CB in zone to widen out pre-snap, and treat Bush as the outside WR. It ends up looking like this pre-snap.
The Flanker is on the numbers, and the CB is on his outside shoulder. In Cover-2, his job is to get a good jam on the Flanker, and force him to take an inside release, into where the help is in the zone. The Strong Safety is aligned even with the TE, and 12 yards off the line of scrimmage. This all changes when a threatening RB motions outside the Flanker. Note the change in alignment.
The primary receiver is the Flanker, let’s say it’s Demaryius Thomas. Defenses have to account for the fact that Murray can run a full route tree when he flanks out. Very few RBs can do so; Reggie Bush is about the only one in the present-day NFL who can, which is where his value comes from. Murray is less dynamic in the open-field than Bush, but he’s much more of a concern as a between-the-tackles runner, so he’s problematic for defenses in a different way.
In this example play, Murray motions out to the sideline, and runs a go route, with an outside release. The TE also runs a go route, to influence either the SS or the Sam LB (or both). Some defenses will check to a man look against this, and some will still run cover-2. That’s the read for the QB, and for Thomas. More often than not, it’ll be man-to-man, and we’re guaranteeing that Thomas isn’t going to be jammed, and that he’ll be able to run either the slant or the out, depending on the leverage of the guy covering him. If the defense plays Thomas too hard, you can get them with the TE or the RB.
Like the Saints do with Bush, Pierre Thomas, and Chris Ivory, the drafting of Murray to go along with Moreno, and a guy like Lendale White, gives the Broncos a lot of versatility with their backfield, and thereby, an excellent way to threaten defenses.
3rd Round, Jabaal Sheard – DE – Pittsburgh – I believe in duplication as a hedge against underperformance. A lot of media people criticized the Broncos for acquiring a lot of RBs and secondary players when Josh McDaniels was first hired, but doing so never served them badly. Especially with pass rushers, there’s a lot of hit and miss, and you can never have too many of them. With a team that wants to play pressure schemes, the defensive line needs to be the most competitive position group on the team. Think about how the Giants approach things. Beal would be Ayers’ backup, and Sheard would be Dumervil’s, if he could beat out Jason Hunter. The Broncos could then have defensive personnel groups for long yardage where they’re rushing with 4 or 5 DEs, like the Giants do.
I didn’t feel like it was worth my time to project past 3 rounds, but the Broncos would presumably add some depth and competition at the bottom of the roster in the late rounds.
The Aftermath – A Conceptual Depth Chart
That’s where this exercise has left us. The talent on the roster has improved, and a good balance was struck between valuing the Draft and signing some right-now Free Agent help. Incidentally, that’s what the McDaniels regime was doing the last two offseasons, and I had a certain un-knowledgeable person on Twitter tell me that signing free agents means you’re not rebuilding, because you’re trying to win now. Of course, that’s nonsense. You’re always TRYING to win now, if you can. Some people are really black-and-white, thought, and it is what it is, I guess.
I’d be happy with the offseason I’ve detailed the last couple days. It seems a lot of people who think like me would be too. Now, it remains to be seen how these many variables play out, and we can only hope they work out well. What do you think?
WWTBD? (Part 1)
December 16, 2010
I’m nowhere near Jesus-like. I mean, hell, if you’re talking about the Christian portrayal of the historical figure Jesus Christ, I can’t even grow a full beard, and I’m already the same age that that Jesus is reported to have died at. If you’re talking about The Jesus, I’ve never had to register as a sex offender and go door-to-door, and I’m not too good at bowling. (My strategy: Use the heaviest ball they have, and throw it straight as hard as I can.) TJ “The Dude” Johnson’s cat, Jesus Quintana? I’m not like him either. For one thing, I’m badly allergic to cats, and for another, I decline to predict the outcomes of football games, or other complex future events. I don’t even really like fish. You get it. I’m nothing like Jesus.
We’re going to play a little game today. It’s called “What Would Ted Bartlett Do?” To me, the game called “What Will Joe Ellis Do?” is lame, and all the work that you’d do to play it becomes valueless as soon as he Does Something. (Just like predicting games… really, does anybody want to go back through your archives to read that, after the games happened?) For this exercise, I’ll theoretically assume the role of an outside football consultant, hired by the Denver Broncos, the guy who’s tasked with righting the ship. (I do love my ship metaphors.) I report directly to the owner, and I have carte blanche to get this thing headed in the right direction. Here’s the plan.
1. TB would start by doing a SWOT analysis on the current state of the organization. From the Department of Don’t Talk About It, Be About It, here goes.
Strengths
a. This is a roster which is talented in several places, most notably Wide Receiver, Running Back, Defensive End/Outside Linebacker, Inside Linebacker, and Cornerback. Each of those positions has quality among the starters, as well as the reserves. There’s also good age balance in each group, and most of these players are scheme-indifferent. (We’ll cover that shortly.)
b. The starting offensive line group is very young and talented, and with experience playing together, should continue to grow into the strength of the football team.
c. The rookie QB Tim Tebow is one of the best overall athletes in the NFL, and has every intangible quality you’d want in a QB. A lot of pundits are doubting his ability to play the position in the NFL, which provides a cover of fairly low expectations, nationally. Tebow will exceed those expectations quickly, because he’s a playmaker, and a winner.
d. The incumbent veteran QB Kyle Orton is a solid football player who has made the most of an excellent scheme this year.
e. The McDaniels regime’s attention to improving the athleticism of the bottom of the roster has led to the presence of a lot of quality special teams players.
f. Kicker Matt Prater and Punter Britton Colquitt are both young and excellent.
g. The local fans buy tickets to games, and there’s a long waiting list for season tickets.
h. The pro scouting has been very good the last few years, and the college scouting has been above average.
Weaknesses
a. The interior Defensive Line and Safety positions are generally old, and limited in their ability to be effective. The Broncos haven’t found enough quality 30-front linemen, and Brian Dawkins has appeared to age a lot this season. Renaldo Hill is very smart and sound, but his athletic limitations indicate that his coaching career should be starting soon.
b. The entire defense lacks a cohesive feel for the game, because they’ve had their schemes changed annually for years. They’re the anti-Chargers, who went from being a confused, mentally-slow team to being one who plays excellent cooperative team defense, with the same basic set of players. Experience in the scheme matters a lot, just like on offense.
c. The Broncos seem to lack vocal on-field leadership, and sometimes don’t play with the energy and emotion that you’d like to see.
d. Tackling has seemingly been a problem for the Broncos for 30 years, and while it’s not as bad as it’s been at times, it could definitely stand to improve.
e. This team doesn’t make its own luck, and isn’t opportunistic.
f. Between the Shanahan and McDaniels regimes, the Broncos have been a technocratic organization, and you can tell that they’re trying to win by outsmarting their opponents, rather than trying to outhit them. Football is an inherently physical game, and while the 2010 Broncos have been physical for parts of games, it’s clearly not this group of players’ natural inclination, as a whole.
g. This roster lacks the kind of depth you need to replace injured players effectively. It’s moving in the right direction on that score, but it’s one more effective talent acquisition cycle from being a strong roster, top-to-bottom.
Opportunities
a. With the firing of Josh McDaniels after less than two seasons, there may be more tolerance of a rebuilding process from the fan base and local media.
b. There is a solid base of talent that was brought in by McDaniels, and that can shorten the necessary rebuilding process, if it’s leveraged well by the new coaching regime.
c. Hiring John Elway into a front office position may inject some loving feelings into a fan and media environment which is presently full of hate and discontent.
d. There will most probably be a rookie wage scale in place by the time of the 2011 Draft, which makes this the first time ever in the modern era that there is no downside to having a top 5 pick. (I’m confident that it will be in place, because both the NFL and the veteran players want it, so it’s a natural place for the players to give something up to get something. The only constituency which doesn’t is the agents, and they’re not represented in the CBA talks.)
Threats
a. The Denver Post clearly feels that it’s their role to conduct advocacy campaigns in order to “help” the Broncos run themselves effectively. The current leadership, embodied by COO Joe Ellis seems to be far too responsive to media negativity, and this threatens to throw the Broncos into a continuous loop of coaching change for the sake of coaching change.
b. Broncos fans are spoiled and entitled, after 30 successful years, which included 7 AFC championship appearances, 5 Super Bowl appearances, and 2 victories. They unreasonably demand winning now, while mostly not understanding that every team has eventually had to rebuild.
2. Having done that, it’s time to consider how to recast the front office. My recommendations are as follows:
a. When Mike Shanahan was fired, Joe Ellis became the most powerful player in the building, because he filled a void. Ellis wasn’t Shanahan’s boss, but he became McDaniels’ boss, and that hasn’t worked out well. Ellis should remain the Chief Operating Officer, but his duties should be walked back entirely to just running the business side, which is a big job, and is the one that he’s well suited for. If he’s dealing with football questions, he’s acting as a surrogate meddling owner who doesn’t know much about football. Those kind of owners lead failing teams in all sports.
b. John Elway should be hired as Executive Vice President for Football Operations. This role should be similar to what Nolan Ryan does with the Texas Rangers, which is essentially serve as a buffer between the football people and the owner. Elway should effectively be the boss of both the GM and the Head Coach, and their sounding board on football matters. Player procurement should be done by consensus between the three. Elway is smart enough to know that he’s not a player-personnel expert, and has been quoted in the media to that effect. He is qualified to lend football perspective, though, and to help form an intelligent consensus. He’s also much better qualified than Ellis to be evaluating the effectiveness of the football operations at a high level, and discussing them with Pat Bowlen.
c. I don’t know if Brian Xanders is, or is not, the answer as GM. I’m indifferent to him returning. If not, I would favor giving Phil Savage a second chance as a GM, and limiting his duties to being the head scout, which is what he’s really good at. In Cleveland, Savage had three downfalls; he hired the wrong Head Coach, he talked (clumsily) to the media far too much, and he hated the business management side of the GM role, and did poorly at it. In this case, he won’t be the Head Coach’s boss, he’ll be instructed only to speak to the media formally, and on a scheduled and monitored basis in the offseason, and never during the season, and the business stuff will reside with Ellis. Savage will be free to scout and procure players, and head up all scouting efforts.
d. I’d definitely keep Keith Kidd (Director of Pro Personnel), and Matt Russell (Director of College Scouting) in place. I’ve been pretty impressed with what has been going on in both shops the last couple of years. Some people say the Broncos haven’t procured the right talent, but that’s not true. They haven’t procured enough of it yet, to successfully complete the holistic roster transformation which they were tasked with.
3. While the talent level in flux the last two years, the Broncos have gotten a great deal of added value from the offensive schemes and play-calling of Josh McDaniels, as well as his excellent game management skills. I think the defense has been somewhat less well-schemed (under both Mike Nolan and Wink Martindale), but it’s been okay. The decision of the new Head Coach is the most important one, by far. A lot of people seem to want to see an all-powerful GM lording over a Head Coach, just because it’s the opposite of how things have been done in the past. The Head Coach should usually have more power in the organization, though, because he’s responsible for the end product.
There are a lot of good coaches out there, and it seems like about 15 have been speculatively linked to the Broncos job. It makes you wonder where these reporters get the names from, because I’m sure that the Broncos aren’t even thinking about 2/3 of them. Since, for the purposes of this exercise, it’s on me to recommend hiring a coach, I’ll walk you through my thought process, and how I go to an answer that most of you probably aren’t going to be too high on.
a. The first task is to identify the entire pool of qualified football coaches who aren’t currently expected to be employed NFL head coaches by the middle of January. Here goes:
1. Sean McDermott DC Philadelphia
2. Marty Mornhinweg OC Philadelphia
3. Perry Fewell DC NY Giants
4. Jim Haslett DC Washington
5. Jason Garrett IHC Dallas
6. Mike Martz OC Chicago
7. Rod Marinelli DC Chicago
8. Dom Capers DC Green Bay
9. Leslie Frazier IHC Minnesota
10. Darrell Bevell OC Minnesota
11. Scott Linehan OC Detroit
12. Mike Mularkey OC Atlanta
13. Bill Callahan AHC NY Jets
14. Gregg Williams DC New Orleans
15. Greg Olson OC Tampa Bay
16. John Fox HC Carolina
17. Jeremy Bates OC Seattle
18. Russ Grimm AHC Arizona
19. Brian Schottenheimer OC NY Jets
20. Mike Nolan DC Miami
21. Dick LeBeau DC Pittsburgh
22. Cam Cameron OC Baltimore
23. Greg Mattison DC Baltimore
24. Rob Ryan DC Cleveland
25. Larry Coyer DC Indianapolis
26. Gary Kubiak HC Houston
27. Rick Dennison OC Houston
28. Charlie Weis OC Kansas City
29. Romeo Crennel DC Kansas City
30. Ron Rivera DC San Diego
31. Hue Jackson OC Oakland
32. Eric Studesville IHC Denver
33. Jon Gruden TV ESPN
34. Bill Cowher TV CBS
35. Brian Billick TV CBS
36. Jim Mora, Jr TV Fox
37. Jim Harbaugh HC Stanford
38. Marty Schottenheimer Out of NFL
39. Jim Fassel Out of NFL
40. Jim Bates Out of NFL
I might be missing somebody, but a list of 40 names is a good starting point, right? I’d be pretty shocked if the next Head Coach of the Broncos wasn’t one of those 40 men. Now, the next question is, what do you want the team to be? This is where I can be a helpful consultant, because I’m stronger with schemes than I am with anything else.
With the talent that’s in place on offense, with all else being equal, I’d definitely try to keep a similar scheme in place to the one that Josh McDaniels installed. The Broncos have a lot of quality talent at WR, and Knowshon Moreno is excellent as a nickel runner, because he breaks the tackles of secondary players very often. I’d be surprised if Pat Bowlen has much of a taste for going back to the “emulate the Patriots” well, because Woody and The Dullards would squawk about it endlessly, even though none of them has any idea what they’re talking about, when it comes to schemes. Ponder this question; who is using a lot of multi-WR sets, and doing it well? We’ll return to offense momentarily.
Defensively, the existing front-seven personnel that you’d want to keep actually lends itself better to a 40-front than it does the 30-front the Broncos have been trying to play. Some of you are shaking your heads, but think about this. Elvis Dumervil was a 4-3 DE his whole life, and most of his sacks have come from rushing the passer with his hand on the ground, even in 2009. He’s a pass-rusher, not a blitzer. (Clay Matthews is a blitzer.) Robert Ayers is a natural strongside DE in an even front. That’s what he did in college, and I’m certain that he’d look better given a chance to do it again. Jason Hunter was always a 4-3 guy before this season, too. Marcus Thomas is a natural one-gap DT, and he’s been asked to play a lot of two-gap stuff the last couple years. Justin Bannan comes from a hybrid scheme in Baltimore, and he can play well in any spot on the DL, from 5-technique to 5-technique. We know that D.J. Williams is scheme indifferent; it might be his greatest selling point. Mario Haggan might struggle in a 40-front as a Sam LB, but if you used him correctly, I think he’d be just fine. Joe Mays is a natural 4-3 Mike. Wesley Woodyard is a natural 4-3 Will. The Broncos don’t have to go back to a 40-front, but I think it’s a better choice, by 55-45%.
So, back to the list of our coaches. There are a lot of interesting names on there, but when I went through it, I pared it down to 10 names. They follow alphabetically:
a. Perry Fewell – New York Giants Defensive Coordinator – A Tampa-2 guy who went 3-4 last season as Interim Head Coach of a bad Buffalo team.
b. John Fox – Carolina Panthers Head Coach – A guy who has been a winner for a long time, and who was left with a bad roster this season in his lame duck season. He has run a zone-heavy 4-3, and his current Offensive Coordinator Jeff Davidson is an Erhardt-Perkins guy who learned his craft in New England from Charlie Weis.
c. Jon Gruden – ESPN TV Analyst – A creative offensive coach who unabashedly loves Tim Tebow’s talent. On the “downside” (not really) he generally doesn’t give a crap about coddling players, and that would offend people like Josina Anderson.
d. Gary Kubiak – Houston Texans Head Coach – A familiar name and face, obviously. He’s been presiding over some soft, technocratic Texans teams with bad defenses, so at least things would look familiar if he brought that MO back to Denver. It’d be like 2000-2008 all over again!
e. Sean McDermott – Philadelphia Eagles Defensive Coordinator – A young Jim Johnson pupil, McDermott likes to heat up QBs with blitzes from a 40-front. He’s 36 years old, and has never been a Head Coach at any level, so that may be a tough sell, but he appears to have the goods.
f. Marty Mornhinweg – Philadelphia Eagles Assistant Head Coach/Offensive Coordinator – Despite a rough tenure as Head Coach of the Detroit Lions, Mornhinweg is very well-regarded, and it seems likely that take 2 would go much better for him. He grew up as a west coast guy under Steve Mariucci, but he’s been exposed to much more vertical schemes with Andy Reid in Philadelphia. Mornhinweg has also been instrumental in helping to re-invent a raw, athletic, left-handed QB in Michael Vick. One downside is that I don’t like how his O-line coach Juan Castillo teaches pass drops. (Hopefully, he wouldn’t come.)
g. Mike Mularkey – Atlanta Falcons Offensive Coordinator – This is the name that’s been in the media lately, and it’s a reasonable one. Mularkey is creative and he likes to use a lot of trick plays, which excites players and fans. I didn’t have a great impression of him as a Head Coach in Buffalo, but he could be another one who does better with a second chance.
h. Mike Nolan - Miami Dolphins Defensive Coordinator – He’s another former Head Coach looking for another chance, which is not a coincidence. I’m targeting that kind of coach, for the most part, because it would fit well with a team that just went through a first-timer making some mistakes. Nolan is a good defensive schemer, and he has some political capital in Denver. It’d be hard for Woody and the Dullards to start taking shots at him too quickly, after spending the last year using him as a tool to beat Josh McDaniels with.
i. Ron Rivera – San Diego Chargers Defensive Coordinator – The luster came off Rivera when Lovie Smith canned him in Chicago in 2006, but it’s come back as he’s gotten the Chargers defense playing really well. Rivera has been in a blitz-heavy 4-3 under Jim Johnson, a Tampa-2 scheme under Smith, and he inherited and adapted a Phillips 3-4 in San Diego. That kind of scheme versatility is useful, and as an added bonus, his departure would weaken the Chargers. The downside is that I’ve heard that Rivera doesn’t interview particularly well, so he may have trouble getting the job, given a chance.
j. Gregg Williams – New Orleans Saints Defensive Coordinator – Williams is one of the truly outstanding defensive schemers in the NFL, maybe the best. The guy is always prepared, and he has an outstanding network of coaches throughout the league, which he’s consciously cultivated throughout his career. (I remember a story when he got hired in Buffalo in 2001, that he’d been keeping notes on other assistants, identifying who was good, and talking to them where possible to build relationships.) Williams would be yet another second-chance guy.
Some near-misses were Bill Callahan, Rick Dennison, Cam Cameron, and Russ Grimm. Jim Harbaugh isn’t realistic for the Broncos, so he’s not here. I know what some of you are thinking; where’s Bill Cowher? Well, I’m not a fan at all. He was the beneficiary of the program in Pittsburgh, and not ever the setter of it. He also consistently had excellent assistants, who did nearly all of the heavy lifting for him, x’s and o’s wise. He’s not what the Broncos need, in my opinion. Also, if you want to hire him, he’s not going to allow himself to be a runner-up publically, so you basically have to decide to hire him, sight unseen. No, thanks.
So, back to the list of 10. I’ve been thinking of who I want to emulate, and some teams from this list aren’t what I’m looking for. Kubiak is out, because I don’t want a soft football team that falls short in close games. I don’t think Nolan works, because he seems like he’s just as difficult to get along with as McDaniels was reputed to be, and his 49ers teams weren’t what I’m looking for. Fewell is a good coach, but I’m inclined to shy away from the Tampa-2 stuff. I’ve also never known him to work with any particularly good offensive coaches, so I wonder if he has any relationships with any. I think that McDermott has a bright future, but he’s pretty young, and it’s hard to do that twice in a row. Rivera is intriguing, but it’s hard to be confident hiring a first-time Head Coach right now.
We’re down to Fox, Gruden, Mornhinweg, Mularkey, and Williams, which is a manageable list of finalists. Each has been an NFL Head Coach, Gruden (the youngest) of two teams. Gruden is 47, Mornhinweg is 48, Mularkey is 49, Williams is 52, and Fox is 55. Age is not a differentiating factor despite the fact that some look younger than others. Any of these five excellent coaches would be good choices, but I can only have one. I reluctantly get off the Fox and Mularkey trains because they like running the ball too much on offense. A lot of ill-informed people think that running is how you win in the NFL, but it isn’t. You win by throwing the ball, and by hindering your opponent’s ability to throw the ball. I don’t think that Gruden’s ideas on defense are the greatest, and I leave him behind based on that.
Choosing between Mornhinweg and Williams, I ultimately go with Gregg Williams. I want to emulate the New Orleans Saints, and Williams gets a ton of production out of his defensive players there. The whole is much greater than the sum of the parts, and the scheme is the main thing. It was the key difference between the 8-8 Saints of 2008, and last year’s Super Bowl champions. As I mentioned, Williams may be the best defensive schemer in the game, having learned a great deal from Buddy Ryan. The main problem with Williams in Buffalo from 2001-2003 was that he was too conservative offensively. He’s been with Sean Payton now for two years, and Payton is anything but conservative. I think that has to have rubbed off on him, and he’ll realize that the Broncos have excellent talent in place on offense. I’d push for him to bring Saints Offensive Coordinator Pete Carmichael, Jr. with him, and give him a lot of autonomy over the offense. Carmichael is young, and has an excellent background, and he doesn’t call plays in New Orleans, so this would be a promotion for him.
Williams doesn’t want to control everything in the organization, and I’m certain that he’ll be an outstanding Head Coach the second time around. He should have been hired by the Redskins in 2008, when Joe Gibbs retired, but Dan Snyder opted to hire Jim Zorn instead, for some strange reason. (It’s the Redskins, you know?) We’d see a cooperative program, shared by Elway, Savage, and Williams. The priorities would be throwing the ball, and stopping the other team from doing so successfully, because that’s how you win in today’s NFL. Tomorrow, in Part 2 of WWTBD, we’ll explore a player acquisition strategy, to go with our shiny new coaches and GM. Hopefully, I haven’t scared you off too much, and you’ll check it out.
In Which I Rip The Denver Post
December 8, 2010
Monday Night Thoughts 25 Comments
Last week I ripped the Broncos fan base for being spoiled, and I included myself in that cohort. We are exactly that, because in team history, it has never rebuilt. It initially built for a long time, did well for 30 years, faded, and now needs to be rebuilt for the first time ever. We’ve covered this, and I feel like my continually talking about the perils and stupidity of unannounced rebuilding has spread the word to others, who are also talking about it.
I believe that Monday may have been the darkest day in franchise history. That occurred to me within minutes of learning of the firing of Josh McDaniels, and I’ve now spent over 24 hours considering whether I’m being overly hyperbolic. As I said on Twitter Sunday, my words count in perpetuity, so I’m careful-ish of what I say. I don’t think I am overdoing it, friends. Let’s consider what really just happened.
The Denver Broncos entered into a full-scale reconstruction of the franchise in January, 2009. Literally everything changed, much of it for the better. The Broncos built a systematic approach to scouting, for the first time in memory. They rid themselves of me-first players, and actively sought out team-first guys. They ignored conventional wisdom, which over a long enough timeline, is always a good thing to do. But they didn’t communicate that they were rebuilding, or ask for patience, or probably even admit to themselves what the situation really was.
Some people will tell you that enough pieces are in place to be a playoff team now. Those people have a point, and the playoffs were possible this year, if not likely. That case can be made, but between injuries, bad luck in games, and lapses in execution, mostly by young players, the wins haven’t been up to the maximum potential that has existed. This happens more often than not; everything could go right, but that doesn’t mean that it will. There are no shortcuts to setting yourself up to be good even on a mediocre day. It’s a long process, and it never stops. The Patriots continue to set the standard in that way.
Back to my comment on the darkness of this day. It’s more than possible that the Denver Broncos have just entered the realm of the long-term losing franchises. This is classic loser behavior, folks, and it gets cyclical really quickly.
If I were just an observer, and not a Broncos fan, the thing I would have respected most about the franchise before yesterday would be their history of ignoring the fans and especially the local idiot media. You can’t come out and say that you’re ignoring them, and you have to glad-hand them now and then, but it’s all a game. You can never, ever let them affect your decision-making, though. Josh McDaniels got that uniquely, and it was the very best quality that he got from his mentor Bill Belichick. When he took the job, I’d bet a lot of money that Pat Bowlen’s history of being calm and patient was the number one reason he chose the Broncos. Here was an owner who would let him coach the way he needed to coach, right?
Woody Paige is the self-appointed Protector of the Fair City of Denver. He sort of operates like a two-bit neighborhood mafia chief, and he imagines that everybody should kiss his ring and pay him tribute. His buddy Gil Whiteley, a local radio idiot, and really infrequent and sparsely followed Twitter user, is like the underboss. Both guys expect access and respect, and they don’t want to have to work very hard for it. They deserve it, and if you don’t realize that, you’re going to feel the consequences. Denver is their town.
Paige has long been the grand poobah in Denver sportswriting, and people inexplicably find his nonsense to be value-adding. He loves to tell stories about how he advised Josh McDaniels, and about how the young whipper-snapper ignored his advice, which was so benevolently given. Lose the hoodie, Josh! Don’t hire Steve Scarnecchia! Be nicer to the media, because you may need them to be nice to you someday! This kid ignored all of that benevolent advice. He has balls, if not good sense.
Over at IAOFM today, one of the best Broncos commenters in the blogosphere, chibronx, called Mark Kiszla and Dave Krieger professional dullards. I think that’s my new favorite word, and I’m going to forever after refer to them as Dullard Mark Kiszla and Dullard Dave Krieger. Dullard will henceforth effectively become both of their first names, anytime I decide to inevitably later regret diving into the cesspool of their worthless writing. Have you ever been reading the Lard over at IAOFM, and several people will comment on how bad some Dullard Mark Kiszla column is, and you look at it, even though you know you shouldn’t, like you’re rubbernecking by some minor highway accident? A few seconds later, once you’re past it, don’t you feel like a jerk for slowing down traffic? I know I do.
Then there’s Captain Obvious Jeff Legwold. It seems that he’s hired to be a half-assed analyst, but he lacks the knowledge of football to do any sort of interesting analysis. He misuses the same terms in the same ways as everybody else, but he acts like he somehow knows more than them. Captain Obvious is a little better than his more-negative former Rocky colleague Lee Rasizer, but he writes in a really Villager-like, Very Serious Person tone. You know, the Broncos could put it all together, and have a great game, and he’d have some Very Serious Concerns to write about. I guess the style of most everybody who writes for other people gravitates to some existing archetype. There’s nothing new under the sun, right? I don’t know what my archetype is, I guess, but WTFevs…
Mike Klis is kind of a self-loathing reporter/columnist, who seems to wish he was covering baseball. His work never includes any insight on anything, and he’s mostly a repeater of the narrative set by Woody and the Dullards. He’s so thoroughly uninteresting and irrelevant that I have nothing else to say about him.
Finally, Lindsay Jones is the beat reporter, and she does a solid job. The best thing about her is that she reports, and mostly stays out of the narrative-setting business. She knows me, and pretty clearly doesn’t like me, but that’s pretty well-earned, so I don’t mind. (I’ve never hit her personally, per se, but I have gone after reporters in general, plenty, and you now know how I feel about her clown-ass colleagues at the DP.) Despite her silent enmity toward me, I will now say something nice about her. She has moderate writing talent; not as much as Woody does when he feels like writing something good once or twice a year, but far more than anybody else at Team Post. (Which didn’t starve Monday night, thanks to Jimmy John’s, according to Lindsay.) She also seems to work hard, and avoid grinding personal axes, and she seems to be learning some football as time goes on. Believe it or not, Lindsay understood and told the world on Valentine’s Day of 2009 that there was a rebuilding job underway. In any case, Lindsay is the one credit to the Denver Post Broncos staff, and in true The Way The World Works fashion, I’m sure they pay her peanuts. With our bad luck, they’ll soon get rid of her for committing acts of quality journalism, like that VD09 piece, and not being more of a team player.
I keep getting away from the reason why Monday, December 6th, 2010 is the darkest day in team history, and I’m going to try to focus now, and get that under control. If I had some ritalin, and I was 18 years old, and in the process of failing out of Keene State College with style and debauchery, I’d do some lines of it to get my head straight. Since I’m 33, and doing very well in an MBA program, and I’ve been drug free for more than a decade, I’ll just have to do the other thing.
Losing teams stay losers because they have bad ownership and upper management. The main trait that those people share is short-sightedness, and the willingness to listen to people who should be ignored, like fans and the media. Yes, even people like me, who know what the hell I am talking about. I know football, but not the intricacies of their business, so I should be taken as what I am; a qualified guy who is looking at things from a high level, but doesn’t, and couldn’t possibly, have the full picture, unless I was working for the team, and was given access to it.
I’m no particular fan of Ronald Reagan (despite his being a fraternity brother of mine), but he had at least one thing right. He patted the extremist religious types on the head, listened to what they had to say, smiled, hugged them on their way out the door, wished their wives and kids the best, and ultimately ignored them when it came to making policy. My approval of that approach, while probably biased by my desire not to have religion imposed upon me, carries to anybody who handles extremists with a deft touch.
Focus…. So, yeah, short-sighted ownership/executive management groups listen too much to external, un-knowledgeable voices, and make rash and stupid decisions based upon it. The teams they run start doing a dance called the See-saw of the Losers. For the Broncos, I fear that it started in about 2006, when they started canning defensive coordinators every year, and thereby helping to plant the seeds for this debacle. Then Mike Shanahan got fired in early 2009, and Pat Bowlen and Joe Ellis hired Josh McDaniels, who was dramatically different than his predecessor.
The McDaniels era has been prematurely, recklessly, and illogically ended after less than two seasons, and the speculation is that the Broncos want to bring in somebody from the old Broncos era, like a Gary Kubiak or a Troy Calhoun. Kubiak will go from coaching a soft, undisciplined team in Houston that doesn’t win enough, and the same thing will likely happen in Denver. After two years, when the team is still losing during the next unannounced rebuilding process, Woody and the Dullards will be calling for a change again, and they’ll get the worst elements of the fan base all riled up again. Then, we’ll get somebody else who’s totally different.
This is what happens with losing teams, folks. It gets cylical, and it’s caused by the local media. If you let them do it once, which the Broncos have now clearly done, they’ll believe that they can do it again and again, and they’ll try. It becomes their favorite sport. You don’t believe me? I’m a Mets fan. I’ve been living with it all my life in that arena. The media negativity unduly affects team operations, and lessens their ability to be effective, time after time. Ask Doug Lee, he’ll tell you.
How about another example? I have lived in Cleveland since January of 2002. I now live easy walking distance from the stadium in downtown Cleveland. The media here couldn’t wait to get Eric Mangini canned a year ago, after only ONE season. That’s utter madness, but the only way Mangini saved his job was by going 4-0 down the stretch, and giving Randy Lerner cover to effectively de-ball his coach by hiring Mike Holmgren as team president. That was probably a good idea, but the point is, Lerner felt like he HAD to do something, one year into a new coaching regime. He’s the owner; he didn’t HAVE to do anything. The word patience doesn’t have any standing here, because the media and fans know that the owner will absolutely never show any if the howling gets loud enough.
That’s what we’re facing now, y’all. A terrible new world in which the owner doesn’t effectively own the team anymore, and Woody and the Dullards do.
For all his mastery of X’s and O’s, McDaniels never fully understood this team was a civic treasure not meant to be treated as a frat house, where the music was cranked to 11 during practices and his buddies pulled crazy pranks like making a secret videotape.
That’s from Dullard Mark Kiszla’s Tuesday column. Do you believe that? It’s a civic treasure, and not an asset of the guy who owns it. We own it, not you, Pat! And we don’t like that newfangled rock and roll music! (Side note: Please don’t call fraternities “frats.” It’s disrespectful and crass, and it says more about you than it does about them. I don’t call my country a C U Next Tuesday, and I don’t call my fraternity a frat. Thanks.)
But McDaniels didn’t create the mess at Broncos headquarters. He threw open the doors for everybody to see there’s no authority figure to provide the franchise with perspective or a steady hand during a crisis.
Woody Paige is now the authority figure, you got it, old man? We’re…. I mean, he is calling the shots! If he’s on vacation, your boy Dullard is the man in charge. I’m the deputy up in here! Sit down and let us experts tell you how it should be done!
We built the Broncos owner the stadium he desired when the money flowed and victory parades rolled in this city.
What a self-righteous jackass Dullard is. The stadium was built by a combination of an increase to the local Denver sales tax, some of the early proceeds of the lucrative naming rights from Invesco, and Pat Bowlen’s own cash contribution of more than $90 million. I have news for you. That’s a better contribution than many new stadiums get from the owners or their future revenue streams, Dullard. Check this out:
You got that? The Cowboys additionally got $150 million from the NFL, and the Giants and Jets got $300 million from them. Denver residents came out just fine in their deal, from the perspective of the dollar contribution they made, relative to the rest of the NFL. Our pal Dullard would have you believe that all of the money for the stadium came out of his personal pocket. Give me a break, okay? Move to Indianapolis, if you don’t like it.
I really hope I am wrong, but I don’t think I am. This team is headed for the see-saw, and it’s because they let the media and fans push them into making a stupid move. Joe Ellis practically admitted that it was all stupid today! I’ll have some thoughts tomorrow-ish about getting the right people in to fix this football product. I have some original thoughts about coaches that will surprise some of you, and not others. For now, I’m going to bed, because it’s 1:11 AM Eastern, and I’ll try not to dwell on this too much.
Debunktion Junction Comes To Adam Schein’s County
November 30, 2010
Monday Night Thoughts 25 Comments
I’m a total multitasker, and technology has made me worse. Twitter is one of my diversions at times, and I’d say I use it very sporadically, unlike a lot of people who use it all day. Today, I was relaxing in my bathroom, taking care of some things, you know how it is, and I fired up the old Tweetdeck on my iPhone 4 to let my mind have something to do. I happened across the following Tweet from my good pal Adam Schein.
There’s a link there, which we’ll get to in due course. First, a little about Brother Schein. He’s a radio guy, and he writes like one. His tone is confrontational and hyperbolic, his language is basic, the concepts he presents are often oversimplified, and not much attention is paid to evidence. It’s like reading a radio show. I’m way too nuanced to ever be a radio guy, so I shouldn’t and don’t knock their skills in that medium, I really just choose to listen, or not. It’s sort of like why you don’t see the GZA out freestyling on street-corners; his genius comes from somewhere different than random and basic in-the-moment emotional hollering.
Anyway, Schein works for Sirius, and I had an unexepectedly good customer service experience with them this morning, so he’s got that going for him. I also attended the 2008 Pro Football Hall of Fame ceremony with a guy named Matt (last name intentionally withheld, because I don’t know if he wants to be publicly known). Matt was an executive producer for Sirius Sports, and he was a really cool guy, who was from the same hometown as Schein, and took up for him, when I said that I thought Adam sucked. (Matt from Sirius is a friend of Matt_R who used to frequent MHR, if you know him.)
On Saturday, I battled it out on Twitter with a Sirius producer named Nick Kostos, who didn’t turn out to be such a bad guy, despite thinking that his powers of wild-ass speculation were greater than the NFL’s ability to investigate the Broncos’ recent video episode. And finally, Schein knows who I am, and has read this site. I’ve hit a lot of MSM people for saying stupid things over the years, and usually I just get grumpy/stupid Direct Messages on Twitter like these:
Yeah… she really told me. BOO-YAH!!!! Schein, though, openly tweeted me once to tell me he liked this site, which, while I didn’t really believe him, I appreciated. I mean, I slammed him violently the last time I wrote about him here. It’s easy to think that when your readership amounts to a few thousand Broncos fans, that the MSM guys you’re hitting don’t hear the tree fall in the woods. This experience has chastened me some, at least with Adam Schein, and has given me an idea. I m going to operate as if he’s not a bad guy, and as if his utter wrongness is just a function of a lack of knowledge and perspective. In other words, I’m going to try to educate him on the Denver Broncos, which I clearly know a lot better than he does. Sounds like fun, right?
For Adam, you’ll want to start here, which dropped last night, and you’ll be aware of my general thoughts about the state of the Broncos. Everybody else has already read it, so we’ll wait for you to catch up. It’s only about 2,000 words, and a segment of Bronco Nation is patient, with the bulk of that segment reading me and the guys at the excellent ItsAllOverFatMan.com.
OK… now that we’re all on the same page, here we go. I’m going to borrow the technique that they use at Kissing Suzy Kolber, and “augment” Adam’s article, like they do with Peter King. (Like giving it a pair of 36DDs.) Only, I’m not going to try to make Adam look bad, per se, I’m just going to try to fill in some knowledge and perspective gaps for him. I’m super busy with my MBA program, and I’m in the middle of a paper about implications on corporate culture in mergers and acquisitions, but again, I feel like the world needs this. Here goes… (Here’s the clean link to Schein’s article, if you feel like you need that).
I laugh when I hear someone say Josh McDaniels deserves to be fired by the Broncos because of “Spygate II,” because “rogue” videographer Steve Scarnecchia taped the Niners walk-through in London. This is one of the funniest takes I’ve ever heard. I crack up when I hear talking heads debating whether McDaniels knew about the taping. I double over in hysterics when I see debate on whether the fine was enough.
Good morning, great people of this planet. Spygate II means very little, other than firing McDaniels with cause and saving money.
OK, first thing, Adam? You don’t have magic powers of wild-ass speculation, and neither does your boy Kostos. You want to think that the NFL missed something in their investigation, and your mind tells you what “really” happened. Sorry… the only known version of the story is the one that the NFL announced, and like I told Kostos Saturday night, I’m in the evaluation of evidence business.
Also, how about we stop with the false equivalence inherent in adding -Gate to anything that’s remotely sordid. The Watergate cover-up was one of the worst moments in the history of the United States, with key leaders, up to and including President Nixon committing clear-cut crimes. This Broncos video episode was a self-reported incident from which no competitive advantage was gained, and which the NFL found was a one-time occurrence by one employee, without direction. I realize you’re not Mr -Gate, Adam, but I hope you can at least agree not to use the stupid term. When it’s used about stupid and inconsequential things, it softens the edges of Watergate, which is unfair to American history. Kthxbye.
McDaniels deserves to be fired for sheer incompetence, for awful people skills that have caused talent to leave the building, for some of the worst personnel decisions in the past two years, for losing games at a rapid rate.
This isn’t about whether McDaniels reported Scarnecchia in a timely fashion.
This is about McDaniels single-handedly ruining one of the best franchises in the NFL.
The Josh McDaniels era (actually, let’s go with the Josh McDaniels error) has been two years of slipping on a banana peel, showing he has no clue how to run an organization. It has been an absolute comedy of errors since he walked into the building.
Hello again! How much wrong can fit in one section? What talent left the building due to his people skills? Talent like this?
a. Jay Cutler – A petulant but talented jerk, who has continued to be that in Chicago, by all reports, and throws the ball to his opponents way too much, especially in the scoring area. Outperformed individually by his replacement Kyle Orton, without any question.
b. Brandon Marshall – An immature but talented player, who is one mistake from missing a big part of a season to a suspension. Outperformed individually by his replacement Brandon Lloyd, by an even wider margin than Orton-Cutler.
c. Tony Scheffler - A wildly overrated clown who was heard in the locker room saying that he couldn’t wait for last season to end, while the Broncos still had a shot at making the Playoffs. This was reported to Josh McDaniels by leaders among the players, and that’s what led to the suspension for the last game of last season. On the field, Scheffler fumbled, dropped passes, and missed blocks frequently, and he’s done nothing very noteworthy in Detroit.
We’ll get back to this issue momentarily.
Let’s remind everyone Denver owner Pat Bowlen canned Hall of Fame coach Mike Shanahan because of a late-season collapse in 2008, the inability to beat Buffalo and San Diego in the final weeks to make the playoffs. Shanahan refused to change his defensive coordinator (remember that), and Bowlen pulled the trigger on his longtime genius.
It’s worth jogging the mental Rolodex that this was not a rebuilding or retooling situation. The expectations were for McDaniels, part of the Bill Belichick tree, to get the Broncos into the playoffs in 2009. And McDaniels has failed, and failed to epic proportions.
This is absolutely wrong. This has been 100% a rebuilding situation, but the Broncos organization has erred by not making that clear. The 2008 Broncos team was a very bad football team. The defense was literally the worst I’ve ever seen. It was absolutely hopeless in every way. The offense moved the ball well, but committed too many turnovers, and didn’t score points when it had opportunities to do so. Football Outsiders’ pythagorean formula said the 2008 Broncos should have been a 4-12 team, and they were probably right. This is either bad memory, or revisionist history by Schein. It seems more like the latter, with all due respect, and even some which may be undue. He can show me where he ever said that either the 2009 or 2010 Broncos were playoff contenders, if he wants, but I don’t remember ever seeing or hearing it.
It all went horribly wrong right after McDaniels was hired. He ignored the fact that he employed the talented Jay Cutler and decided to inquire about obtaining Matt Cassel, a quarterback he worked with successfully in New England when Tom Brady was injured. It was a huge mistake. It showed McDaniels’ inexperience in being a head coach and executive. It showed he didn’t understand the inner workings of the media and how his inquiry would morph into a major breaking story.
As a result, Cutler never trusted McDaniels again, and it led the Broncos to trade their franchise quarterback, something they never planned on doing when the coach was hired. Go back to McDaniels’ first news conference. Read the early Bowlen commentary on what McDaniels and Cutler could do together. Players started looking sideways. Trust was broken.
Matt Cassel has produced on the field better than Cutler has, too. And let’s remember who ordered the divestiture of Mr. Cutler. It was Pat Bowlen himself, because he was furious at Cutler for ignoring calls and text messages. (Petulant jerk, remember?)
This is a theory of mine, but I’m pretty sure I’m on something close to the real story. Jay Cutler told the media that he was very upset with the firing of Shanahan, as you can see in this Rocky Mountain News article. (Remember them?) But it turns out that Cutler was actually told ahead of time, and didn’t squawk that much at first. Prior to selecting a replacement for Mike Shanahan, Bowlen said that he’d keep Cutler informed, and that “he’s the man around here.” Cutler told everybody who’d listen that he wanted the offensive staff to stay intact. Just read those articles, and consider if you think Cutler’s comments and attitude are appropriate.
Giving Cutler any input, and allowing his petulant comments to go un-addressed were errors by Bowlen, if he wanted to hire McDaniels, because in the McDaniels way of thinking, no player should ever be bigger than the team. A huge reason why the Belichick way works in New England is that Tom Brady accepts that he’s a player, and he never tries to insert himself into matters above his paygrade. As he noted recently, if he were consulted in personnel matters, Deion Branch and Lawyer Milloy never would have left.
I believe that Cutler’s comments to the media probably offended and troubled McDaniels, before he even was hired. They definitely set the stage for what could become an untenable coach-player relationship. Knowing that he would probably face a lot of resistance from Cutler vis-a-vis the new program, and wanting to use his own offensive scheme, I’m sure that inquiring about Cassel seemed like a good move. At the very least, it tells Cutler that he’s a player, and not “the man around here.”
Schein notes that McDaniels is part of the Belichick Tree, but that doesn’t mean that winning automatically and immediately happens. It means that he was raised in a way of thinking that is very particular as to the concept of a team. Schein, like the name-dropping douchebag Jay Glazer, and Miss “HILLIS HILLIS HILLIS LOL” is a player sympathizer and mouthpiece, because maintaining strong relationships with players is necessary to his job. I get that, and have no real problem with it, but it’s instructive. You have to take what they say with a grain of salt, because they clearly aren’t independent.
McDaniels’ relationships with Brandon Marshall and Tony Scheffler would eventually lead to these offensive weapons being traded the next offseason.
While Marshall was an off-the-field knucklehead, McDaniels never really took the time to try to make it work. And he seemingly had instant disdain for the pass-catching tight end Scheffler. And if boy wonder McDaniels thought he wasn’t a fit, then Scheffler, despite catching 49 balls in 2007 and 40 in 2008, wasn’t a fit.
McDaniels’ frosty personality and clumsy management style chased Cutler, Marshall and Scheffler. And this gets the headlines. But it represents just the tip of the iceberg for inept decisions and futility.
Here, we get some more thoughts from the players’ perspective. Who is Schein to say that McDaniels shouldn’t be able to scheme his offense how he sees fit, or that that offense should value soft non-blocking TEs with horrible attitudes, just because they’re on the roster?
How about spending a first-round draft pick last year on Robert Ayers, who was far from a sure thing? Ayers didn’t record a sack in his rookie season and has just 1.5 this season. There were better players, non-projects, on the board.
Schein fundamentally misunderstands the Broncos’ defensive scheme, and Ayers’ role in it. Schemes and technical football aren’t really Adam’s area of expertise, but luckily they’re mine. The Broncos run a Fairbanks-Bullough 3-4 scheme. In that scheme, the 3 defensive linemen are asked to play 2 gaps each, and the 2 OLBs are asked to consistently set the edge in the running game. The 2 ILBs are kept clean to run to where the ball is, and make the bulk of the tackles. When Ayers has played this year, he has been outstanding at that job, as good as anybody in the NFL. As the Sam LB, that’s his number one purpose. He’s been pretty good as a pass rusher too, despite only having 1.5 sacks. He’s not speed rushing, like, say, Clay Matthews, who is a Will LB in a more LeBeau-style pressure scheme. Ayers played most of the Ravens game with a broken foot, and the Ravens ran the ball well in the second half. Against the Jets, 49ers, and Raiders, and Chargers, with Ayers out, the Broncos struggled against the run, not coincidentally. Sacks aren’t the only measure of quality in an OLB, Adam. I know you haven’t seen much Broncos football, and may not even know what “setting the edge” means, but trust me; Ayers is doing it really well, and it’s tremendously important in the Broncos’ scheme.
But even worse, during the same draft, McDaniels, in a move of both arrogance and ignorance, traded a 2010 first-round pick for the opportunity to draft Alphonso Smith in the second round. Now, we bashed this move when it was made. It was McDaniels’ first NFL draft, and he treated it like a kid dealing baseball cards. Did he learn anything about value, about the art of the deal from Belichick?
You don’t give away a future first-round pick for a second. And for Alphonso Smith! Smith couldn’t even see the field during his rookie year. He was totally lost. And he was so bad McDaniels was forced to trade him after one season to Detroit for non-factor tight end Dan Gronkowski. This represents a flat-out embarrassment. This represents having no clue how to run a team. This represents the lowest of lows in running a war room. Matt Millen knew better!
This is just bad logic. You DO give away a future first-round pick for a second, if you think you’re getting a player who is worthy of that first round pick. The rule of thumb for valuing future picks is that you set them to the middle of the round, one round later. It works sort of like the Time Value of Money, where a dollar next year is worth less than a dollar today. In other words, next year’s first round pick is appropriately valued as the middle pick in this year’s second round. The value difference comes from having the player now, rather than in the future, and in the cap era, also from the fact that your financial exposure on a high second rounder is less than a middle first rounder will be next year.
I’ve covered all this, in the past, and my regular readers know it, but I went through it for Adam. He should ask Gil Brandt next time they talk if what I’m saying makes sense. (It does.) As for the player in question, Alphonso Smith, I covered him in my Monday post that everybody’s read. He was well-regarded by many, including me, and he hasn’t worked out as expected. That happens to every team, where a player doesn’t play up to expectations, for whatever reason. Smith was the seventh best CB in the Broncos’ 2010 training camp, and they didn’t see the improvement they expected, so rather than hang on to him, they cut their losses, and shored up another position. Intelligent people don’t ride a sunk cost into more costs, if it isn’t productive. Divesting Smith was both courageous and correct, just like Raheem Morris canning both Jeff Jagodzinski and Jim Bates was. (He got killed by the idiot MSM for both moves, of course, and now they’re drinking a nice glass of STFU, and acting like they believed in Morris all along. I had Morris’s back on both moves in the moment, and I have been proven to be emphatically correct, like usual. Check my MHR archive, if you want.)
But wait. It gets worse.
Peyton Hillis was a Mike Shanahan guy. Hillis, strong and versatile, played great for Shanahan in 2008, including a majestic performance the Sunday after Thanksgiving, barreling over and beating the favored Jets in New York. Hillis was a bit of a Shanahan sensation, playing running back, fullback, special teams, and once was quoted as saying he would play linebacker for Shanahan.
So, of course, McDaniels had no use for him and thus barely played him in 2009. So, of course, he traded Hillis to the Browns for a third-string quarterback, a first-round bust in Brady Quinn in March 2010. And because McDaniels never seems to have a plan, one month later, he drafted Tim Tebow, to help ensure that Quinn had no chance to ever play behind Kyle Orton and the former Florida star. Hillis has been one of the best running backs in the NFL this season in Cleveland. Once again, it shows ego, poor talent evaluation and no direction, no correlation between one move and the next.
I also talked about the Hillis-Quinn trade yesterday, but Adam’s comment there needs a rebuttal. The Broncos play a nickel offense almost all of the time, and they don’t use Fullbacks much. Their profile for RBs is that they need to be able to run,catch, and block equally well, because their scheme calls for them to do all three. Hillis is an atrocious blocker; the Browns know this, and rarely ever even ask him to do it. He also isn’t as fast as the Broncos would like a player in that position to be. Knowshon Moreno has been playing excellent football lately, and is a great fit for what the Broncos are trying to do in all three phases.
As for Hillis, he definitely had a couple good games for the Broncos as a rookie, but he was Shanahan’s 5th choice as the starting Tailback, behind Andre Hall, Selvin Young, Michael Pittman, and Ryan Torain. (Shanahan didn’t like him at FB, either, because of his blocking deficiencies. Spencer Larsen mostly started, as he does today for the Broncos.) Hillis was given a few opportunities by McDaniels early last season, and he got stuffed on some short yardage plays, and fumbled the football, notably on a kickoff return. I don’t remember Schein saying that Hillis was going to thrive like this in Cleveland, even though a lot of Broncos fans haven’t been terribly surprised. Any one of us who know what we’re looking at would tell you that he’s good at running and catching the ball, but he’s a bad blocker, and he fumbles too much. That’s exactly what he’s been and done in Cleveland. The Broncos didn’t have Hillis wrong; they just wanted to go in a different direction.
And, as a side-note, let’s forget this stupid narrative that McDaniels somehow hated all Shanahan players, okay? It just doesn’t hold any water at all. Or, maybe Larsen, Eddie Royal, Daniel Graham, Chris Kuper, Ryan Clady, Ryan Harris, Elvis Dumervil, D.J. Williams, Wesley Woodyard, Champ Bailey, and Matt Prater don’t count. That’s also known as every single worthwhile player who was on the 2008 Broncos, who was willing to accept the ways of the new program, as their contracts required them to do. (Hillis seemed not to openly buck against the program like Cutler, Marshall, and Scheffler, although there have been reports of him not practicing at the high tempo desired by this staff.)
McDaniels has had strained relationships with players and coaches. How do you let Mike Nolan leave the building? How do you clash with the only great hire you made to your original staff? Wasn’t the defensive coordinator the big issue for Shanahan and Bowlen? Nolan is well-respected around the league. He was attracted to the McDaniels situation because they have the same agent. As a control freak, McDaniels wasn’t the boss Nolan expected. McDaniels reportedly had an issue with Nolan’s play-calling last season and took issue with the strategy. And thus, the head coach let his best asset go.
Nolan is a good defensive coordinator, but he blitzed more than McDaniels wanted to. It’s always in the purview of the Head Coach to set the overall team strategy, and McDaniels comes from a philosophy of being sound against the run, and balanced on the back end, while favoring ball skills in their DBs. The other part of the story is that Nolan wanted another year of security on his contract, and Miami was offering it. Denver declined to do so. Their parting was mutual, but it’s somehow all pinned on McDaniels by everybody, not just Adam Schein. Meanwhile, Wink Martindale’s scheme has been fine, if the execution hasn’t always been, mostly due to a ton of man-games lost on that side of the ball by key players.
All of the above, frankly, is more damning than the controversial pick of Tebow. I happen to like Tebow as a potential pro. It’s more damning than drafting an injured yet supremely talented receiver in Demaryius Thomas is the first round. Being fair, I like both these players. But the issue for McDaniels is whether the Broncos, who needed help on defense, should’ve picked a project quarterback and banged-up receiver in the first round.
And, as Bill Parcells once said, “You are what you are.” The body of work speaks for itself. After a 6-0 start, his team sputtered to an 8-8 finish. The Broncos are in dead last in the AFC West at 3-8. They gave up 59 points at home to the Oakland Raiders in a game where Darren McFaddentold us, “It looked like we broke their will.” They gave up 59 points at home to the damn Raiders. It has to make Bowlen ill.
I think that that Parcells quote is oversimplified nonsense, but it’s taken as gospel for some reason. I started writing a column about that recently, and got sidetracked from finishing it, but I’ll run it one of these days. That Raiders game was definitely a debacle, but the Broncos have an opportunity to get some revenge in a few weeks. I expect that they will do so with a vengeance. And, yeah, the Broncos are 3-8, but if a few breaks went another way, they could easily have a winning record. Plus, as mentioned, they’re in a secret rebuilding process, regrettably.
Denver fans should be thankful for Steve Scarnecchia. He hopefully delivered the dagger in forcing a change. As if you needed any more visual evidence that McDaniels is in way over his head. He is a losing football coach. He can’t run an organization.
This is a non-sequitur from the jump-off. Scarnecchia is a guy who made a mistake, and embarassed the organization. I am not thankful for that. As for McDaniels’ ability to run an organization, apparently Schein has been reading John Clayton archives.
Coaching the Denver Broncos is a plum job. The NFL is better when the Broncos are relevant. They aren’t right now. Denver needs to hire a legit new general manager, who will hire the next coach. The Broncos need to follow the Falcons model from a few years back after Bobby Petrino quit like a coward.
Denver deserves a winner. You shouldn’t need a rogue videographer to help you see the Broncos don’t have one. There’s no excuse, Pat Bowlen. Save your franchise.
Denver doesn’t deserve anything by virtue of being Denver. Success comes to those who do the right things over a long period of time. Josh McDaniels is mostly doing them, but forces in the media continue to agitate for his tenure to be limited to an unreasonably short period of time. I told Nick Kostos the other night that I think McDaniels is targeted by media people who don’t like Bill Belichick personally, but find it hard to criticize him much, because he wins. (Kostos disagreed without being disagreeable, for the record.) Eric Mangini insulates himself by being really secretive. McDaniels is very forthcoming and reasonable with the media, on virtually all topics except injuries, and this allows him to be targeted. For a guy with bad people skills, McDaniels sure comes across as a pretty personable guy in his press conferences. When he’s back next year, with more talent on the roster, and more continuity in the current schemes, media people like Brother Schein are going to be eating a lot of crow, because the Broncos are going to be contenders sooner rather than later. I have a suspicion that a lot of the agitation from the national media types is about avoiding ever having to eat any. I’ll just be smirking, in my semi-arrogant, Kanye-like way, once again.
Another County Heard From (Cuyahoga, That Is…)
November 29, 2010
Monday Night Thoughts 584 Comments
I’ve been feeling pretty hostile toward a large part of the Broncos fan base lately. I used to think that we were a really educated and reasonable fan base. Through the magic of Twitter, I’ve learned that neither is actually the case. Broncos fans, by-and-large, are tremendously spoiled, and short-sighted. They don’t know much about football, and they don’t try too hard to learn about it from resources like It’s All Over Fat Man and Mile High Report. (The Broncos MSM only has negativity and obviousness to contribute, of course.)
On that note, here’s the ever-growing media narrative: the Denver Broncos are on the wrong track because their young egomaniac coach has set out to destroy a once-proud team. Doug Farrar from the often-craptastic Football Outsiders grew up in Denver, and this is the truth, according to him. Mark Kiszla thinks Josh McDaniels looks like a beaten man. (Which for Mark, would be a big success!) This whole thing reminds me of when noted assholes TJ Simers and Bill Plaschke of the Los Angeles Times successfully ran Dodgers’ GM Paul DePodesta out of LA after 2 years. They hated the young, Harvard educated, Moneyball-reared DePodesta, and called him Google Boy, like knowing how to use The Google is a bad thing. Luckily, Pat Bowlen said Monday that it’s not going to work.
The most frequent charge against McDaniels is that he’s a terrible personnel guy. I think that’s hogwash, aided by a lot of hindsight. There has really been no transaction that seemed egregiously bad in the moment, where somebody knowledgeable would say that it made absolutely no sense. Everybody likes to hit the Broncos for the Peyton Hillis trade, but I’m sure it seemed like a pretty good deal to them at the time. Hillis wasn’t what the Broncos were looking for in a back (and still isn’t, for the record) and they’d lost two games in 2009 largely due to Chris Simms’ suckitude. Why not shore up your backup QB position with somebody who has looked functional-to-solid at times in the NFL, and give up a guy who you weren’t going to use anyway? Eric Mangini had his Jets defense run over by Hillis once, in the best game of his career to that point, and thought he was worth a look. It seemed like a solid trade for both teams, and the only real objections came from some Broncos fans who had developed man (and woman) crushes on the rare caucasian tailback.
(Yes, caucasian-ness is the primary driver for the majority of the love that Hillis gets. You can’t possibly convince me otherwise, because as a player, he’s not too different from Reuben Droughns or Mike Anderson. Identifying with people who look like you doesn’t make you a racist, necessarily, so there’s no need to get butt-hurt about this. For what it’s worth, as a policy, I’m only really interested in dating white women, and I’m definitely not a racist.)
You get my point, though, right? No Peter King, Mike Silver, John Clayton, or Pork Chop Williamson screamed about the greatness of Hillis at the time of the trade. They were more focused on the possibility that Quinn may be able to beat out Orton. They trumpeted the factoid (which is a thing that’s believed to be a fact, but actually isn’t) that Quinn played in the exact same offense McDaniels runs at Notre Dame. Quinn has sat on the bench, like backup QBs do. Hillis has had success running and catching the ball this year, (which a lot of Broncos fans, including me, weren’t really that surprised about), and suddenly McDaniels is an idiot who traded away the franchise RB they needed to run the ball with success. How could he not have known he had the NFL’s only one-man running game on his roster? This guy doesn’t even need an offensive line! McDumbass is a fool!!!!!!
The Alphonso Smith thing didn’t work out for the Broncos, but I loved him coming out of Wake Forest too, and so did a lot of other people. The Broncos had him graded very highly, so they made the move. (And, yes, for the hundredth time, trading next year’s #1 for a high #2 this year can be a great deal if the player works out well.) It’s funny how Smith was suddenly great, and McDaniels suddenly missed the boat on him, because he’s intercepted some passes for the Lions, and then he gets eviscerated on national TV last Thursday, and nobody knows for sure what the meme is anymore. Alphonso and Josina Anderson are seemingly still bffs, for what that’s worth, and she noted stupidly that his 5 picks would lead the Broncos, although if he were still in Denver, he wouldn’t be seeing the field, of course. (I’m hip to her game; she buddies up to players like a lower-rent Jay Glazer in high heels. You have to take them both with a serious grain of salt, for that reason.)
I’ve made this point on Twitter a lot lately, but the Broncos’ biggest problem has been their unwillingness to lower expectations, and call a rebuilding process what it is. They’re the only team in the NFL which isn’t allowed a grace period to rebuild, largely because they haven’t asked for one. (There’s also the aforementioned spoiled-fans factor, which has been really bad, too.) In the last 30 years, the Broncos have two seasons of ten or more losses, 10 in 1990, and 11 in 1999. Both of those bad seasons were flanked on either side by seasons of double-digit wins, so they were understood to be aberrations. No rebuilding program was called-for, or happened. No lifelong Broncos fan knows what it’s like to go from good, to rebuilding, to good again. It’s never happened in team history, after all, until now.
Here’s the rational question, to me. Do you really want to flush the last 2 years, and start over again? If you do,understand that that means a whole new program, new schemes, new personnel requirements for those schemes, and, consequently, more losing. You’re suddenly running the risk of becoming a franchise that loses all the time and changes coaches every three years, never setting a consistent direction. We’ve already seen this on defense, but it’s been every year, and it’s unquestionably ugly. Think of haphazard, direction-less rebuilding as equal to 5 defensive coordinators in 5 years.
Everybody needs to understand an important, if uncomfortable fact. The Denver Broncos don’t deserve to win by virtue of being the Denver Broncos. Those who think otherwise are delusional idiots, like those who simplistically think that America will always dominate the world, just by virtue of being America the Exceptional. In either case, and in all observable reality, there’s no shortcut to real, sustainable success. You have to make the right choices, and do the necessary work over a long period of time. Success must be earned, and sometimes the getting-there process is painful. Sometimes, you have to rebuild, and your messaging has to reflect that, or you’re bringing trouble upon yourself.
I see teams like the Browns, Rams and Lions doing things to promote future success, and their fans are justifiably excited. The Broncos are doing similarly good structural things, but to a lot of our fans, largely thanks to the idiot media narrative, Josh McDaniels has taken a Good Team and turned into a Bad Team. The truth is, he took over a Bad Team, and it’s now a Growing Team in transition, most especially on offense. They have issues with consistency and execution, which are typical of young groups.
Everybody has noticed that the Broncos have been really successful with scripting plays lately, and that they were extremely successful coming off their bye. A lot of people seem to be struggling to grasp what this means, but it’s very clear and obvious to me. The young players on offense perform at a very high level when they’re comfortable with exactly what they’re supposed to be doing, and they’re confident that they can accomplish the results they’re seeking. This indicates a very important thing; if this group is given time to continue to learn and grow and improve together, they’re going to get to be more consistent, because they’ll all be more comfortable throughout entire games. Nothing will ever be particularly new to them anymore. A few new plays each week will be easily digestable, and the recurring stuff will see more and more consistent proficiency.
This is what I think, in general. The schemes that the Broncos are using in all phases of the game range from fine (defense, special teams) to excellent (offense). If the McDaniels regime can survive this firestorm of negativity and misinformation, there’s no logical football reason to fire them. In fact, I would evaluate doing so to be illogical and reckless. You don’t spend a lot of time and money acquiring players to do certain tasks, and then flush that process before it has a real chance to be successful. Intelligent business-people don’t do that, regardless of what ass-clowns like Mark Kiszla say in the Denver Post. You stick with the plan until it’s pretty clear that the plan is only going to lead to losses. We’re nowhere near that point yet, folks.
The talent on offense is good, and all it’s lacking are experience and repetitions. I particularly expect Zane Beadles and J.D. Walton to improve for next season, and Demaryius Thomas and Eric Decker to really compete for playing time on offense as second year players. I also expect Tim Tebow to give Kyle Orton a lot of competition, and maybe beat him out. I think that Tebow will ultimately prove to be the better long-term option, because his ability to make plays with his feet, and his emotional leadership style will provide dimensions that have been missing. I think he’ll be able to make the throws that Orton makes with some more experience and coaching. Finally, for the Hillis-lovers, I believe that Knowshon Moreno is proving to be an outstanding fit for the kind of offense the Broncos are running. He’s doing everything well right now, and he’s only going to improve.
The talent on defense leaves quite a bit to be desired. I think that Champ Bailey needs to definitely be re-signed, and I’m hopeful that Andre’ Goodman will finally get healthy yet this season, and play at his 2009 level. I’m encouraged about Perrish Cox and Syd’Quan Thompson for the future, but they both will have significant room to improve. I’m not too thrilled with the Safety play I’ve seen this season, and I’d be really reluctant to count on Brian Dawkins and Renaldo Hill as starters in 2011. I wish Darcel McBath would stay healthy, so we could see what we have there, but in any case, I’d be looking to draft a FS high in 2011, not that there are any elite ones available. I like Mark Barron from Alabama as a possible second round guy.
The defensive line needs some talent infusion, and that’d be a good place to spend a first round pick, in a strong draft for those players. I think Justin Bannan, Marcus Thomas, Kevin Vickerson, and Jamal Williams are solid rotation guys, but it’d be really nice to get somebody in there who can win matchups, and disrupt offenses. I, for one, am 90% happy with the linebacking corps. Mario Haggan and Jason Hunter have held up very well in the running game, for the most part, and I’ve really liked what I’ve been seeing from Joe Mays as a downhill player. I think he needs a contract extension, once the CBA gets figured out. With Elvis Dumervil and Robert Ayers both available, the pass rush would be improved, but I’d like to see a pass rush specialist drafted to use in sub packages.
If the McDaniels regime is allowed to continue, and some better defensive talent is acquired, this team will win more games. The offense will gain continuity from repetition, and the defense will have better depth (a huge problem right now) and the key players will also mostly be in their second year in the scheme. If Pat Bowlen gives in to the idiots in the local MSM and the fan base, and fires McDaniels, we should get used to losing, because it’s bound to continue in the near term. I’m just glad to see that Bowlen seems to be keeping calm about this.
Getting Deep About Running The Ball
October 6, 2010
Technical Football 16 Comments
I’m a corporate finance guy, by profession, and one of my favorite words is fungible. It’s a fairly specialized word, and many of you may not know it, so I’ll explain what it means. If an item is fungible, that means that individual units of that item have mutual sameness, in terms of value, and are easily substituted. (Commodities tend to be fungible, as mutual sameness is a lot of what makes something a commodity rather than a product.) Currency is fungible. One dollar bill has the exact same value as another dollar bill, even if the second one has a phone number written on it lipstick. A bushel of corn is also fungible, as is a barrel of light sweet crude oil. Here is the Wikipedia article, if you’re interested.
Employees tend not to be fungible. Do y’all know of Bill Barnwell of Football Outsiders? He’s kind of a B-minus football thinker who thinks he’s an A-plus. Like all the guys at Football Outsiders, and others of their ilk, they tend to over-value statistics, especially the proprietary ones that they create. Anyway, this fellow Barnwell had a silly tweet the other night.
I explained to this guy what fungibility means, and how punters don’t have mutual sameness, and are therefore not substitutable. After one lame response about how I should take a broader view of punters’ skills, he ignored me. Fungibility, as explained, means that one item is just as good or bad as the next substitute. They’re materially indistinguishable from each other, so there’s no point in ever choosing one over another. Barnwell obviously doesn’t understand what the word means, from his tweet. He’s trying to sound smart, but is actually sounding dumb. It happens, I guess.
I don’t bring this up to show how I got the better of this guy. I can get the better of him any time I feel like it . That episode, and an unrelated conversation I had with my father last night about the lack of fungibility of a shipyard’s labor force got me thinking about how nothing whatsoever in football is commoditized or fungible. It’s a fairly obvious thought, and I’ve been at the edges of it before, but it kind of all came together for me last night.
Here’s a thought exercise for you. What does an ideal Running Back look like, in terms of the attributes that produce the final product? How about an ideal Center? What’s the best offensive personnel grouping for 3rd and 5 from the 50 yard line? What play maximizes your ability to pick up the first down? These questions all have the same answer. Each depends on a lot of different factors. Everything about football is complex, so no part of it is fungible.
If you want to consistently play winning football, you need to start at the very bottom, and decide in detail how you want to construct your program. This seems simple and intuitive, but when a coach takes over a football team, he has an existing state of affairs to contend with. There are coaches, players, and salary cap implications to consider. The new guy needs to evaluate which, if any, holdovers fit into his long-term vision for the program.
I’m obviously not in Josh McDaniels’ head, but I feel pretty qualified to describe his offensive plan, from 20 games worth of observation. He wants the Broncos to be primarily a passing team on offense, which is smart in today’s NFL. He recognizes the need to run the ball, both to set up the pass, and to run the clock once you have a lead. The screen game is frequently used, and is an extension of the running game, more than the passing game. We’ll discuss that later.
Running is secondary, but it’s important. Because the primary goal is to be effective throwing the football, you have to start there first. An offense that throws the ball frequently needs offensive linemen with the primary ability to move well in all four directions, and to anchor and mirror once they reach their engagement point. Different protection concepts have different engagement points for each position. An engagement point is simply the place on the field where first contact is made. It generally depends on the drop depth of the QB.
This is a bit of a digression, but it’s an advanced piece of football information that’s worth sharing. When a QB is going to take a 5 step drop, a receiver is going to run an intermediate route like a 12-yard In-cut, and the tackles are going to take two steps backward, and widen out against a speed rusher (making his outside angle wider) before engaging and riding the rusher past the QB’s designated launch point. Everybody knows the plan, and it all works together.
Back to the story. The linemen are selected to be good pass protectors first, and good screen players second. When you’re dropping back to throw all the time, screening is an essential element of stressing a defense horizontally, and slowing down the pass rush. In that way, and from a risk-management perspective, it acts like the running game. The biggest play of Sunday’s game between the Broncos and Titans was the 41 yard screen pass to Eddie Royal. It forced the Titans to spread out from the box area, and slow down on the pass rush. The offensive line played better as the day went on, but that play stressed the Titans horizontally, and forced them to spread out their defense more than they were.
You have a robust passing game, and an improving screen game. Finally, there’s the running game, which has been lousy this season for the Broncos. There are several reasons for that, which we’re now going to discuss. It really gets down to a holistic understanding of the offense, which is why I started on the passing and screen games. I’m not the only guy in the world who’s qualified to get into this level of detail, but I may be the only on who’s willing to do it for the Broncos.
The first question is why.
1. Why do the Broncos pass the ball? They pass because it’s the most efficient way to score points and gain leads in football games. Once leads are gained, the opponents necessarily are limited in their ability to be tactically flexible. Having a lead is always the goal.
2. Why do the Broncos use so many screens? Screens make both downfield passing and traditional handoff-based running more effective by forcing defenses to spread out pre-snap, and to read the initial action of all eligible receivers before pursuing the QB or RB with the ball. The Broncos are currently an average screening team, and they were below average at it in 2009. The best screen team in the NFL is New Orleans, which does things nobody else does in the screen game.
3. OK, so why do the Broncos run? They run to set up the pass, and to control the clock while maintaining a lead. They also do it to entice defenses to play man-to-man in the scoring area. Remember how I discussed the Broncos passing scheme a couple weeks ago?
There’s literally no right defensive answer, because the scheme is determined to play 11 on 10 (or 9), and is flexible enough to accomplish that, no matter the counter-measure.
I just went there. I quoted myself. Bill Barnwell would be so disappointed.
He can get at me when he gets the definition of fungible down. Extending my thought about creating a situation where there is no right defensive answer, you can incorporate the running game into that overall aim. Go with me here. Let’s say we have 11 personnel on the field, which is the most common grouping that the Broncos use. This is passing personnel probably 75%-80% of the time, so defenses are going to substitute in a CB, and substitute out a LB.
Defenses will either lean toward trying to pressure the QB or playing coverage. If they’re bringing pressure, or stacking the box, screens are a really good idea, especially on early downs, and against zone blitzes. If you think they’re going to give you cover-2 with seven men in the box, you want to run the ball. If you’re getting man-to-man, maybe throwing the ball is a good idea. If a blitz is coming from one side, either throw to that side, or run away from it.
When an offense is really clicking, like New Orleans was for most of 2009, it can attack whatever a defense shows. That’s where the Broncos are trying to get to this season, and they aren’t far from it. They need to start running the ball better, and there are a few ways they can start doing that right away.
For one thing, I think the Broncos should stop using Fullbacks on any play which isn’t short yardage with 2 yards or less to go. They have gotten very little value from Spencer Larsen as a blocker, and they got negative value from Dan Gronkowski Sunday. The Broncos best personnel packages are 10 and 11, especially once Knowshon Moreno gets healthy. I was listening to former coach and scout Chris Mattura speak on Sirius NFL Radio a day or two ago, and he hit on a fundamental belief of mine in offensive football, that I don’t consider to be obvious.
When the defense thinks you’re going to run, you should consider passing. When they think you’re going to pass, you should consider running. That historically has pertained to down and distance, but increasingly in the modern NFL, it pertains just as much to personnel groupings. When the Broncos have 3, or especially 4 WRs on the field, and they’re spread out a lot, either 2X2 or 3X1, defenses have to be really worried about that, and they have to have a lot of DBs on the field, aligned outside to match up with them.
That kind of personnel grouping definitionally means there are less good tacklers on the field, because you’re mostly looking at backup CBs in the place of starting LBs. Mattura made the point on the radio the other night that he believes in never accounting for blocking CBs in base personnel. You block linemen, linebackers, and safeties, and leave it to the RB to get past the play-side CB. His point was valid that if a RB can’t beat a CB most of the time, that means you need a new RB.
In today’s NFL, nickel and dime running are where it’s at, especially for a team like the Broncos that really likes to throw the ball. It may seem counter-intuitive to take out a FB and a TE to run the ball better, but it’s the smartest thing the Broncos can do. Every time I see them in 21 or 22 personnel, I wonder why in the world they’d do that. It’s wasting a body on a bad FB, and practically asking the defense to stack the box, and have more hats there than you do. On the topic of nickel running, I remember when Knowshon Moreno was drafted in 2009′s first round. I didn’t like the pick at the time, but I remember Michael Lombardi talking about it on NFL Network that night, and he brought me around. (He’s one of the few guys on the internet who writes about football who I actually think is smart.)
Lombardi’s point was that Moreno was an ideal nickel RB, because he’s a very good blocker and receiver, and because he’s powerful enough to run through the arm tackles of most DBs. Moreno has been missed the last two games, but I really feel like he can be effective running from these sub packages, against a lot of defensive backs. But please, no more fullbacks, okay? I know Merril Hoge likes them, and has his own utterly retarded nickname for them, but they provide negative value for the Broncos. (I do love Larsen on special teams, though.)
The other thing the Broncos need to do is get their offensive line healthier, and working well together. I’d advocate for getting Zane Beadles ready to step in at LG, because I’m not impressed with Stanley Daniels’ play the last couple weeks. I think a group of Ryan Clady, Beadles, J.D. Walton, Chris Kuper, and Ryan Harris is what the team had in mind when constructing the 2010 roster, and I’d like to see the Broncos go that way soon.
Once you have your five guys, they can start getting on the same page in working together. Clady isn’t quite himself yet, but we can only hope that his health improves pretty quickly. I applaud his toughness and effort, and he is mostly doing a pretty good job. I think Kuper and Harris are going to get better as they get further away from their recent injuries. Walton has been excellent as a rookie, and I’m anxious to see Beadles at LG, where I think he fits best. The line needs to play better, but I believe that they can, and they will. We just may not see clear, discernible evidence of it until after the Baltimore and Jets games, because those teams are really good up-front. They’re also both really beatable through the air, and screen game.
Briefly, please allow me to make a note about blocking schemes. Do y’all know @ProsB4Hos? He’s a Broncos fan, and he means well, but I think he’s a fairly negative fan. He seems to hate Josh McDaniels and love Peyton Hillis, for example, which in both cases, seems to run counter to rooting for the Broncos. If that’s how he wants to do it, though, vaya con dios. I invoke Pros (I don’t know his real name ) because he tweeted the following to Doug Lee and I on Sunday night.
I addressed his tweet on Sunday, but it’s a point that needs to be widely made. Where does this “power system” nonsense come from? If you’re yelling The Denver Post, I think that was the origin of it too. Power System is a Denver Post neologism, best as I can tell, like islamofascist. Suddenly, a lot of Broncos fans think the blocking scheme has changed to something foreign and communist. All you see on #broncos is pining for the days of zone blocking. Things were so good when we were zone blocking. McD is a fool!!!!
*Best 30 for 30 on ESPN narrator voice* What if I told you that the Broncos are still mostly using zone blocking techniques? Would you be shocked? How about if I just come out and told you that there’s no such thing as a Power System? I mean, we’re getting into dangerous territory here. You’d have to take it on faith that I know something about football that nobody at the DP knows. Can you take that leap?
I’m leaping, whether y’all are coming with me, or not. Here goes. There are two primary types of blocking techniques used in the NFL. They are as follows:
1. Zone Blocking – The linemen take a read step, and then move laterally in a coordinated manner, and blocks areas rather than specific players. There’s a lot of combination blocks by uncovered players. (That means a player with nobody straight over their face will double-team with a covered player briefly, and then move off to hit a LB at the second level. The best I’ve ever seen at doing so was Tom Nalen.) By getting defenders moving laterally, and cutting backside pursit, the zone blocking scheme can create a lot of cutback lanes.
2. Angle Blocking – This is the other kind of blocking, and it’s the kind that anybody who was a lineman in pee wee football learned to do. There is no read step in angle blocking, and linemen either move forward to hit a player in front of them, or pull to a different location to hit another player. It can be considered a somewhat man-to-man approach, but it’s more landmark based than specific person based. By that, I mean the plan will call for the Center to block the first guy to his left, and the left guard to pull to the right edge, and for everybody else to work off of that.
You want your linemen to be hitting with power in both schemes, obviously. Most teams tend to favor one style or the other, but nearly all use elements of both from time to time. The McDaniels regime is using more angle techniques than the Shanahan regime did, but I wouldn’t say that they’re doing it on more than 25% or 30% of run plays. (I’m not charting the plays, so that’s an estimate by me, but I’m sure it’s pretty close to whatever the right answer is.)
Think about the teams with really big offensive lines, like Cincinnati, Dallas, Minnesota, Miami, New Orleans, and San Diego, and feel free to use this table I created to help you do so:
Those are teams that are using a lot of angle blocking, and their play-calling reflects the size of their linemen. These are big guys who are playing straight-ahead football. (New Orleans is an exception, to some degree, in the sense that they use a ton of screens, despite being a big group. The make it work really well, though.) Even Dallas, which runs a lot of outside receiver screens and inside RB draws does it without moving linemen laterally. (It’s actually pretty brilliant and unique, what they do. Tony Romo takes a 3 step drop, and reads both inside and outside. Whichever is a clearer matchup gets the ball.)
The five should-be starters for the Broncos average 6-4 and 308 pounds, which is bigger than the players they used in the Alex Gibbs days, when guys would be fined for getting to 300 pounds. If you listen to the dopes at the DP, you’d think there was some sea change with the adoption of this mythical Power System. (My dad used to run a business that sold power systems to the US Navy, and my first job out of college was there, so that name makes me laugh.)
So here’s another table I made, showing the Broncos and some other smallish groups.
Do you notice something? The Broncos are on average about a pound bigger than the guys on the Patriots. If you listen to the Know-Nothing Party errr DP, you’d think New England had some kind of huge line group like the Bengals. It’s a Power System, after all, right? The truth is, all of these teams do a lot of zone running and screening, and that requires more nimble offensive linemen. I reiterate, both the Broncos and Patriots employ both zone and angle blocking principles. Both teams actually use more zone techniques than angle techniques, if you want to get into facts, or whatever. Both teams like versatility in their linemen, which should be no surprise, since they like versatility throughout the roster.
So, back to @ProsB4Hos and his tweet. It’s not a “Power System”, we’ve established that. Even if it were the Dolphins running an angle blocking scheme, Peyton Hillis still wouldn’t necessarily be a great fit for what the Broncos are doing, and what they’ll be trying to do as time goes on. We’re WAY stuck on Peyton Hillis as an overall fan base, and the hate and discontent is mostly fed by the Know-Nothing posse in the Denver media. Noted idiot Mark Kiszla actually said that Hillis is diminishing Josh McDaniels’ IQ, as if he doesn’t realize how completely absurd that comment is. Josina Anderson, well, I picked on her last week, and y’all know about her crush on the P-Man. Today though, brother Pork Chop took the cake (after taking some donuts, pork rinds, and other stuff too, no doubt). I can’t even adequately describe how stupid it is, so I just screen-grabbed it.
The answer to the Broncos’ struggles is a guy who they traded away. As if they could just take him back. As if the Broncos are going to start running the ball with one back 25-30 times a game. As if McDaniels is just some kind of idiot who failed to see the brilliance that Mike Shanahan and Eric Mangini saw and see.
Here’s the deal with Hillis, which is a reiteration for me. He’s a good runner and receiver, and he’s pretty well-suited for the kind of scheme he’s in. The Browns have him running a lot of straight-ahead, quick opening runs, and some swing passes. It’s right up his alley, and he’s getting good blocking, which is a highly underrated aspect of the story. I’m happy for Hillis, who has established himself as the preeminent white tailback in the NFL. As the guys at Kissing Suzy Kolber would say, he’s Welkah Tough. (I just learned of that site today, but I find it to be fantastic.)
There is a very good reason Hillis is not in Denver, though. He’s a guy who wears down a defense, and gets stronger as he gets more carries. He’s also an awful blocker, and don’t let anybody tell you different. Even in Sunday’s game, he was very, very clumsy in pass-protection. I didn’t even watch it that closely, but there was a notable time when he backed into Seneca Wallace without being pushed into him. He just doesn’t have a feel for it. He’s also a bad run-blocker, so you can’t use him as a FB. He gets decent initial contact, but he has no technique to maintain blocks. Pork Chop is wrong that Hillis was lead blocker in college. He was a third-option runner, and a first-option receiver from both Tight End and the backfield. He “blocked” a little bit, but rarely ever as an Iso FB in the B gap. That’s why he was a 7th round pick. He was a slowish, white tweener. It turns out, he’s a good halfback if you put him in the right situations. Good for him, and the Browns, who have deemed it the right move to put him in those situations.
I didn’t hear Josh McDaniels say this myself, but I saw a paraphrased comment on the excellent It’s All Over, Fat Man! from Ponderosa:
Thanks for the kind words, Ponderosa, but especially, thanks for the bit about McDaniels’ interview on the Fan. Not being in the Denver market, I miss those, and I appreciate it. It makes sense, what McDaniels said, right? Hillis isn’t a good blocker, and he doesn’t make DBs miss in nickel running situations. He’s very good at catching the ball, but I’ve never really seen him do a lot of screening. He’s not a guy who should be in a limited-use role in a pass-heavy offense. McDaniels did Hillis a favor by sending him out.
So, we’re back to fungibility, where we started. Strategies in football vary, as do priorities, coaching styles, and personnel. Players are not fungible, just as no human resources anywhere are. People are not commodities. Next time you hear somebody say that Peyton Hillis would improve the Broncos running performance, send them the link to this. I promise you, he wouldn’t improve anything right now. The struggles are not just due to a player-carrying-the-ball issue, they’re due to a scheme issue, and a blocking execution issue too. Those things are all going to improve.
The Broncos need to move the football and score points as a result of moving the football. Whether it be throwing downfield, screening, or running the ball, they have every ability to do that. Running the ball with handoffs is going to be tough the next two games, but we’ll talk more about it as those games get close. For now, focus on the things we talked about, and especially, look for more 10 and 11 personnel. If it occurs to me, it’s going to occur to the Broncos coaches too.
The Broncos are a good team this year, whether or not they run the ball. Running it will make the whole road easier to hoe, though, and I believe that they can improve quickly and noticeably in that area. If I didn’t, I wouldn’t have written more than 4,000 words about it. I’m Ted Bartlett, and I approve this message.

















